Epstein Secrets

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian, Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did

on for review of the order granting the stay.1Pe On August 26, 1999, this Court denied both the Former Husband's and the Guardian's motions. PN5. The Notice of Appearance filed by the attorney stated she appeared "on behalf of the Guardian." A Notice of Appearance was also filed by the Guardian "on behalf of the mi

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian, Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did

ion for review of the order granting the stay.** On August 26, 1999, this Court denied both the Former Husband's and the Guardian's motions. PN5. The Notice of Appearance filed by the attorney stated she appeared "on behalf of the Guardian." A Notice of Appearance was also filed by the Guardian "on behalf of the mi

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian. Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did

on for review of the order granting the stay. *4 On August 26, 1999, this Court denied both the Former Husband's and the Guardian's motions. FNS. The Notice of Appearance filed by the attorney stated she appeared "on behalf of the Guardian." A Notice of Appearance was also filed by the Guardian "on behalf of the mi