Epstein Secrets

iami; Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellant. Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin, & Perwin, and Joel S. Perwin, Miami; Bar- ranco, Kircher, Vogelsang & Boldt, and Kimberly L. Boldt, Miami, for appellee. Before GERSTEN, SHEVIN, and SORONDO, 33. ON APPELLANT'S RENEWED MOTION TO PRO- HIB

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian, Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did

iami; Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellant. Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin, & Perwin, and Joel S. Pcrwin, Miami; Bar- ranco, Kircher, Vogelsang & Boldt, and Kimberly L. Boldt, Miami, for appellee. Before GERSTEN, SHEVIN, and SORONDO, JJ. ON APPELLANT'S RENEWED MOTION TO PRO- HIB

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian, Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did

iami; Cynthia L. Greene, Miami, for appellant. Podhurst, Orseck, Josefsberg, Eaton, Meadow, Olin, & Perwin, and Joel S. Perwin, Miami; Bar- ranco, Kircher, Vogelsang & BoIdt, and Kimberly L. Bolds, Miami, for appellee. Before GERSTEN, SHEVIN, and SORONDO, ON APPELLANT'S RENEWED MOTION TO PRO- HIBIT F

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian. Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did