Epstein Secrets

ppellate proceeding. West's P.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.310(0. [4] Child Custody 76D C ,903 76D Child Custody 76DXUI Appeal or Judicial Review 76Dk903 k. Right of Review and Parties. Most Cited Cases (Formerly 211k19.3(6)) Guardian ad litem did not have authority to submit brief or motions at appellate level of child custody

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian, Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did

llate proceeding. West's P.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.3100). [4.I Child Custody 76D fe=i903 76D Child Custody 76DX111 Appeal or Judicial Review 76Dk903 k. Right of Review and Parties. Most Cited Cases (Formerly 211k19.3(6)) Guardian ad litem did not have authority to submit brief or motions at appellate level of child custody

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian, Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did

llate proceeding. West's F.S.A. R.App.P.Rule 9.310(0. (4] Child Custody 76D sE :, 903 76D Child Custody 76DXHI Appeal or Judicial Review 76Dk903 k. Right of Review and Parties. Most Cited Cases (Formerly 211kI9.3(6)) Guardian ad litem did not have authority to submit brief or motions at appellate level of child custody

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian. Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did