Epstein Secrets

T IN THESE AP- PELLATE PROCEEDINGS BY THE GUARDIAN AD DIEM AND/OR COUNSEL APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM GERSTEN, Judge. Appellant, Deborah M. Perez ("the Former Wife), moves this Court to prohibit further involvement in these appellate proceedings by the Guardian ad Litem ("Guardian") and coun

ings conflicts with these functions, and violates the statutory prohibi- tion against Guardians acting as advocates. See§ 61.403 Fla. Stat. (1997); Scaringe v. Herrick, 711 So.2d at 204. Simply, the Guardian does not have a statutory right to appear in these proceedings. See Betz v. Betz, 254 Neb. 341, 575 N.W.2d

IN THESE AP- PELLATE PROCEEDINGS BY THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM AND/OR COUNSEL APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM GERSTEN, Judge. Appellant, Deborah M. Perez ("the Former Wife"), moves this Court to prohibit further involvement in these appellate proceedings by the Guardian ad Litem ("Guardian") and cou

dings conflicts with these functions, and violates the statutory prohibi- tion against Guardians acting as advocates. See§ 1.403 Fla. Stat. (1997); Scaringe v. Herrick, 711 Eld at 204. Simply, the Guardian does not have a statutory right to appear in these proceedings. See Betz v. Betz, 254 Neb. 341, 575 N.W.2d 4

MENT IN THESE AP- PELLATE PROCEEDINGS BY THE GUARDIAN .LITEM AND/OR COUNSEL APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE GUARDIAN. LITEM GERSTEN, Judge. Appellant, Deborah M. Perez ("the Former Wife"), moves this Court to prohibit further involvement in these appellate proceedings by the Guardian ad Litem ("Guardian") and cou

ings conflicts with these functions, and violates the statutory prohibi- tion against Guardians acting as advocates. See§ 61.403 Fla. Stat. (1997); Scaringe v. Herrick. 711 So.2d at 204. Simply, the Guardian does not have a statutory right to appear in these proceedings. See Betz v. Betz, 254 Neb. 341, 575 N.W.2d