Epstein Secrets

T IN THESE AP- PELLATE PROCEEDINGS BY THE GUARDIAN AD DIEM AND/OR COUNSEL APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM GERSTEN, Judge. Appellant, Deborah M. Perez ("the Former Wife), moves this Court to prohibit further involvement in these appellate proceedings by the Guardian ad Litem ("Guardian") and coun

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian, Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did

IN THESE AP- PELLATE PROCEEDINGS BY THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM AND/OR COUNSEL APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE GUARDIAN AD LITEM GERSTEN, Judge. Appellant, Deborah M. Perez ("the Former Wife"), moves this Court to prohibit further involvement in these appellate proceedings by the Guardian ad Litem ("Guardian") and cou

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian, Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did

MENT IN THESE AP- PELLATE PROCEEDINGS BY THE GUARDIAN .LITEM AND/OR COUNSEL APPEARING ON BEHALF OF THE GUARDIAN. LITEM GERSTEN, Judge. Appellant, Deborah M. Perez ("the Former Wife"), moves this Court to prohibit further involvement in these appellate proceedings by the Guardian ad Litem ("Guardian") and cou

We note that the Former Husband's petition did not seek an award of split cus- tody. In its order, the court noted that the Guardian. Jac- queline Valdespino, testified there was a substantial change in circumstances in accord with the Former Husband's position. However, the court explained that it did