Epstein Secrets

olding period was negative 29.6% (a premium) to 71.0%, with an overall mean and median of 22.3% and 20.1%, respectively. • Hertzel — Smith Studya6. Hertzel and Smith conducted a study on discounts associated with restricted stocks. The study was based on approximately 106 restricted stock transactions t

.6% 30.4% 15.0% 20.3% 15.2% 2009 43% 15.1% 5.8% 16.4% 283% 13.8% 18.7% 7.4% 2010 -63% 13.2% 0.7% 60.3% 21.1% 12.7% 20.9% 11.6% Noties; We excluded companim with CAGR indkations that were negative. We excluded companica with negative KIRT indications. this is not indieative of fat

olding period was negative 29.6% (a premium) to 71.0%, with an overall mean and median of 22.3% and 20.1%, respectively. • Hertzel — Smith Studya6. Hertzel and Smith conducted a study on discounts associated with restricted stocks. The study was based on approximately 106 restricted stock transactions t

.6% 30.4% 15.0% 20.3% 15.2% 2009 43% 15.1% 5.8% 16.4% 283% 13.8% 18.7% 7.4% 2010 -63% 13.2% 0.7% 60.3% 21.1% 12.7% 20.9% 11.6% Noties; We excluded companim with CAGR indkations that were negative. We excluded companica with negative KIRT indications. this is not indieative of fat

olding period was negative 29.6% (a premium) to 71.0%, with an overall mean and median of 22.3% and 20.1%, respectively. • Hertzel — Smith Studya6. Hertzel and Smith conducted a study on discounts associated with restricted stocks. The study was based on approximately 106 restricted stock transactions t

.6% 30.4% 15.0% 20.3% 15.2% 2009 43% 15.1% 5.8% 16.4% 283% 13.8% 18.7% 7.4% 2010 -63% 13.2% 0.7% 60.3% 21.1% 12.7% 20.9% 11.6% Noties; We excluded companim with CAGR indkations that were negative. We excluded companica with negative KIRT indications. this is not indieative of fat