Epstein Secrets

nference Control 277 36.1 Introduction 277 36.2 High-Level Control Mechanisms 277 36.2.1 The Need for Adaptive Inference Control 278 36.3 Inference Control in PLN 279 36.3.1 Representing PLN Rules as GroundedSchemallodes 279 36.3.2 Recording Executed PLN Inferences in the Atomspace 279 36.3.3 A

han using a Handle based notation which Atoms would be referred to as 1, 3433322, etc.; but sometimes we will use the Handle notation as well. Some ConceptNodes and conceptual PredicateNode or Schemallodes may correspond with human-language words or phrases like cat, bite, and so forth. This will be the mino

hosen an alternate strategy for PLN. We have one inference control scheme, which is quite simple, but which relies partially on EFTA00624425 36.3 Inference Control in PLN 279 structures coming from outside PLN proper. The requisite variety of inference control strategies is provided by variety in the non-PLN

usual, but making use of Metallodes as well as ordinary CT nodes. The modeling of Metallodes is quite similar to the modeling of Nodes representing ConceptNodes and PredicateNodes using embedding vectors. In this way, one can use standard, small decision tree models to model fairly large portions of CTs (be

36.3 Inference Control in PLN 281 36.3.4 Basic Forward and Backward Inference Steps The choice of an inference step, at the microscopic level, may be done in a number of

y, there may be patterns across large numbers of nodes that merit encapsulation in individual nodes. For instance, if there are 1000 fairly similar ConceptNodes, it may be better not to merge them all together, but rather to create a single node to which they all link, reifying the category that they collect