5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
t. As I have shown, MANY within the SEC had my information. Including SEC NY. Which is why the SEC corruptly moved the handling of the complaint to the SEC LA. While never bringing ANY individual complaints against UBS San Diego brokers. The UBS trading activity: My information UBS acknowledged in the com
admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers
own, EFTA00070226 MANY within the SEC had my information. Including SEC NY. Which is why the SEC corruptly moved the handling of the complaint to the SEC LA. While never bringing ANY individual complaints against UBS San Diego brokers. The UBS trading activity: My information UBS acknowledged in the com
admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers
t. As I have shown, MANY within the SEC had my information. Including SEC NY. Which is why the SEC corruptly moved the handling of the complaint to the SEC LA. While never bringing ANY individual complaints against UBS San Diego brokers. The UBS trading activity: My information UBS acknowledged in the com
admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers
t. As I have shown, MANY within the SEC had my information. Including SEC NY. Which is why the SEC corruptly moved the handling of the complaint to the SEC LA. While never bringing ANY individual complaints against UBS San Diego brokers. The UBS trading activity: My information EFTA00072146 UBS acknowle
admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers
own, EFTA00065105 MANY within the SEC had my information. Including SEC NY. Which is why the SEC corruptly moved the handling of the complaint to the SEC LA. While never bringing ANY individual complaints against UBS San Diego brokers. The UBS trading activity: My information UBS acknowledged in the com
admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers
Entities connected to both the SEC LA and al acknowledge Parallax
Pasquinelli
PERSONNorberg
PERSONChris Dilorio
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATIONDick Best
PERSONBerger Montague
ORGANIZATION
Donald Trump
PERSONSEC NY
ORGANIZATIONUBS Financial Services, Inc.
ORGANIZATIONThe Financial Crimes Enforcement Network
ORGANIZATIONVicon
ORGANIZATION
FinCEN
ORGANIZATION
Denver
LOCATION
Abraham Lincoln
PERSON
Goldman Sachs
ORGANIZATIONIG Hoecker
ORGANIZATIONArena/Bradly
ORGANIZATIONOpco Denial
LOCATIONKevin Goodman
PERSONVikas Arora
PERSON