Epstein Secrets

ltiples of the revenue generated by stand alone KCG/Knight doing "similar or less" volume. The quarter I refer to: 1Q2014. My "March 2014 letter to McKessy". Where ANOTHER massive ibcrease in OTCM share volumes occurred. AND where an immediate investigation SHOULD have been triggered. It did not. In fac

admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers

y. Cifu is KNOWINGLY LYING Further: Recall: ANOTHER example of SEC corruption: the KCG 1Q2014 "astronomical" OTCM share volume metrics expunged by McKessy, Norberg, Pasquinelli, et al from the 1Q2014 10O: The KCG stand alone 1Q2014 10O: the basis of my March 2014 letter to McKessy with Berger Montague

admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers

y. Cifu is KNOWINGLY LYING Further: Recall: ANOTHER example of SEC corruption: the KCG 1Q2014 "astronomical" OTCM share volume metrics expunged by McKessy, Norberg, Pasquinelli, et al from the 1Q2014 10O: The KCG stand alone 1Q2014 10O: the basis of my March 2014 letter to McKessy with Berger Montague

admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers

y. Cifu is KNOWINGLY LYING Further: Recall: ANOTHER example of SEC corruption: the KCG 1Q2014 "astronomical" OTCM share volume metrics expunged by McKessy, Norberg, Pasquinelli, et al from the 1Q2014 10O: The KCG stand alone 1Q2014 10O: the basis of my March 2014 letter to McKessy with Berger Montague

admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers

y. Cifu is KNOWINGLY LYING Further: Recall: ANOTHER example of SEC corruption: the KCG 1Q2014 "astronomical" OTCM share volume metrics expunged by McKessy, Norberg, Pasquinelli, et al from the 1Q2014 10O: The KCG stand alone 1Q2014 10O: the basis of my March 2014 letter to McKessy with Berger Montague

admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers

y. Cifu is KNOWINGLY LYING Further: Recall: ANOTHER example of SEC corruption: the KCG 1Q2014 "astronomical" OTCM share volume metrics expunged by McKessy, Norberg, Pasquinelli, et al from the 1Q2014 10O: The KCG stand alone 1Q2014 10O: the basis of my March 2014 letter to McKessy with Berger Montague

admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers

y. Cifu is KNOWINGLY LYING Further: Recall: ANOTHER example of SEC corruption: the KCG 1Q2014 "astronomical" OTCM share volume metrics expunged by McKessy, Norberg, Pasquinelli, et al from the 1Q2014 10O: The KCG stand alone 1Q2014 10O: the basis of my March 2014 letter to McKessy with Berger Montague

admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers

y. Cifu is KNOWINGLY LYING Further: Recall: ANOTHER example of SEC corruption: the KCG 1Q2014 "astronomical" OTCM share volume metrics expunged by McKessy, Norberg, Pasquinelli, et al from the 1Q2014 100: The KCG stand alone 1Q2014 100: the basis of my March 2014 letter to McKessy with Berger Montague

admits also repeatedly admits that shams like Parallax are money laundering shells. WHY? Just ask who trades them. In Parallax Goodman, the SEC et al acknowledge Parallax as a money laundering shell. Yet no AML complaint. NITE top trader? To further prove my point: The SEC approved Parallax 51: June 2019 with sellers