Epstein Secrets

From: =ynthia Jewett <mailto. Date: =uesday, February 27, 2018 at 3:21 PM 2 EFTA_R1_01657477 EFTA02520608 To: =dam Waldman <mailto • = mah Saadiq mailto Subject: =W: Private and Confidential, in response to our meeting. Erin Ellison Mr. Waldman, Your client, Lawrence Krauss, copied me on h

eted its fact =athering. Our courts recognize that participants in an =dministrative investigation have a privilege against a defamation =harge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 140 =riz. 335, 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized =hat the employer's response to a notice of charge of =iscrimination filed

proud of our team, a=d I believe they feel the same way. =div> Thanks for your attention to these letters. =/u> Lawrence Krauss =/div> Dear Ms. Saadiq: 5 EFTA_R1_01657538 EFTA02520653 <=pan style="font-size:10.5pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serir>My name is A=am Waldman, and I am Professor Lawre

Times=New Roman",serif'> Our courts recognize that participants in=an administrative investigation have a privilege against a defamation char=e. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 140 Ariz. 335, 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Di=. 2 1984), the court recognized that the employer's response to a =otice of charge of discrimination filed

got back on wifi and reading now From: =/b>Cynthia Jewett Date: Tue=day, Februa 27, 2018 at 3:21 PM To: Ada= Waldman mailt <mailto: c: Nai=ah Saadiq mailtc , Erin Ellison Subject: FW:=Private and Confidential, in response to our meeting. Mr. Waldman, Your client, Lawrence Krauss, copied me on

eted its fact =athering. Our courts recognize that participants in an administrative investigation have a =rivilege against a defamation charge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 14= Ariz. 335, 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that the employer's response to a notice of charge of =iscrimination filed

f our team, and I believe they=feel the same way. Thanks for your attention to these letters. 4=iv> =div> Lawrence Krauss</=pan> =div> Dear Ms. Saadiq: 5 EFTA_R1_01657605 EFTA02520710 My name is Adam Waldman, and I am Professor Lawrence=Krauss' litigation counsel. Earlier this week, I sent the

_01657604 EFTA02520709 Our courts recognize that participants in an adm=nistrative investigation have a privilege against a defamation charge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 140 Ariz.=335, 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that the emp=oyer's response to a notice of charge of discrimination filed

From:. Lawrence Krauss [mailto mailto Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 4:19 PM To:<=pan class="m_-8865247676199483936Apple-converted-space"> Nai=ah Saadiq mailto C nthia Jewett <mailto • Cc. <mailto <mailto: Subject: Private and Confid=ntial, in response to our meeting. <=iv style="margin:0in 0i

657719 EFTA02520780 * Our courts recog=ize that participants in an administrative investigation have a privilege =gainst a defamation charge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 140 Ariz. 335= 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that the employ=r's response to a notice of charge of discrimination filed

am proud of our team, and I believe they feel the same way. =/u> Thanks for your attentio= to these letters. Lawrence Krauss <=u> =div> Dear Ms. Saadiq: 5 EFTA_R1_01657841 EFTA02520863 My name is Ada= Waldman, and I am Professor Lawrence Krauss' litigation counsel.&n=sp; Earlier this week, I se

fact gatherin=. <=span> Our cour=s recognize that participants in an administrative investigation have a pri=ilege against a defamation charge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 1=0 Ariz. 335, 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that=the employer's response to a notice of charge of discrimination fil=d

d and =encored. I am proud of our team, and I believe they feel the same =ay. Thanks for your attention to these letters. Lawrence Krauss Dear Ms. Saadiq: My name is Adam Waldman, and I am Professor Lawrence =rauss' litigation counsel. Earlier this week, I sent the =ttached letter to Buzzfeed via one

eted its fact =athering. Our courts recognize that participants in an administrative investigation have a =rivilege against a defamation charge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 140 Ariz. 335, 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that the employer's response to a notice of charge of =iscrimination filed