Epstein Secrets

To: Katherine Stead >; Aamir Akram < >; Max Kleinert Cc: Clifford Fourie >; Oliver Bettin >; Tanushree Kirti ; Christopher Whyton < Subject: RE: Family Office Initiative - Follow Up [I) Hi Katherine — thanks for in

ore fundamentally, I think the SLA needs to be reviewed and consider re-executing under the new management structure. Specifically Yanni Pipilis and Stefan Hoops need to be party to the agreement. Furthermore, if Yanni stated to CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0052091 CONFIDENTIAL

hey won't get dinged on these clients) Shout with qs thanks From: Katherine Stead Sent: 19 July 2018 10:37 To: Aamir Akram Max Kleinert < Cc: Clifford Fourie ; Oliver Bettin Subject: Family Office Initiative - Follow Up [II ; lain Macara < > Classification: For Internal use only Further to our call th

ore fundamentally, I think the SLA needs to be reviewed and consider re-executing under the new management structure. Specifically Yanni Pipilis and Stefan Hoops need to be party to the agreement. Furthermore, if Yanni stated to Todd that KCP need to own the product (as opposed to client) appropriateness, the

thanks From: Katherine Stead Sent: 19 July 201 To: Aamir Akram Cc: Clifford Fourie Subject: Family Office Initiative - Follow Up (II Max Kleinert Oliver Bettin ; lain Macara Classification: For Internal use only Further to our

ore fundamentally, I think the SLA needs to be reviewed and consider re-executing under the new management structure. Specifically Yanni Pipilis and Stefan Hoops need to be party to the agreement. Furthermore, if Yanni stated to Todd that KCP need to own the product (as opposed to client) appropriateness, the