5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
GLD0S183 Dimension Capdal Management Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%
arid SOF performs-te against one benchmark a=y; quart*ee may differ When bon1Pared to other Percher:Joking soirees. S we OF. SOF J. SCir ri and SOF Ili data isnot included in the data set used to calculate the berichnlaitt data (21 +-damnation veseirted in this chart its based on the marched results
GL00S141 Greg Martin Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%
I arid SOF rc performa e against one benchmark OnlY: qualtaeS may differ When tomPlued to other benthrnarking souses.S we OF. SOF J. SCir ti and SOF Ili data isnot included in It * data set reed to calculatethe berichnlaitt data (21 Inlormation vesterted in this chair ie based an the inaudted results
GLOUS113 Oat lig Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%
arid SOF performrc a e against one benchmark a=y; qualt*ea may differ When coral-Awed to other benctenarking soirees. SOF. we SOF J. SCir ri and SOF Ili data is not included in the data se used to calculate the SeriChltaitt data (21 Inlormation yes/sited in this chart is based on the ursocited result
GLDUS139 Third Lake Capital Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%
I arid SO)- III performa e against one benchMark OnlY: quait*ee may <Idler When comb:reed to other bench.marking soirees. S ra OF. SOF J. SCir and SOF Ili data snot included in Iv* data set teed to calculatethe berichnlait data (2) Inlormation yes/sited in this chair It based on the inaudted results of
GL0US140 Lawrence Hirsch Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%
arid SO)- III performa e agarrst one benchmark a=y; quedfee may differ When swill:cued to other benchnuirking sorates. S ra OF. SOF J. SCir ri and SOF Ili data isnot included in the data set used to calculate the benchmark data (21 Information yes/sated in this chart ie bused an the urauelted results o
Entities connected to both Cambridge Associates' and SOF Ili