8
Shared Docs
8
Same-Page
8 / 8
Mentions
arly stage) US$1,654m 29 / 75 / 737 35 / 149 / 2,837 1.5x 1.2x 20% 42% 1.3x 0.3x 30% 44% Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance5,6,7 Secondary funds: Net IRRto limited partners8 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 04 05 Upper Qu
OF II and SOF III performance against one benchmark only; quartiles may differ when compared to other benchmarking sources. SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III data is not included in the data set used to calculate the benchmark data. (6) Information presented in this chart is based on the unaudited result
arly stage) US$1,654m 29 / 75 / 737 35 / 149 / 2,837 1.5x 1.2x 20% 42% 1.3x 0.3x 30% 44% Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance5,6,7 Secondary funds: Net IRRto limited partners8 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 04 05 Upper Qu
OF II and SOF III performance against one benchmark only; quartiles may differ when compared to other benchmarking sources. SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III data is not included in the data set used to calculate the benchmark data. (6) Information presented in this chart is based on the unaudited result
arly stage) US$1,654m 29 / 75 / 737 35 / 149 / 2,837 1.5x 1.2x 20% 42% 1.3x 0.3x 30% 44% Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance5,6,7 Secondary funds: Net IRRto limited partners8 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 04 05 Upper Qu
OF II and SOF III performance against one benchmark only; quartiles may differ when compared to other benchmarking sources. SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III data is not included in the data set used to calculate the benchmark data. (6) Information presented in this chart is based on the unaudited result
arly stage) US$1,654m 29 / 75 / 737 35 / 149 / 2,837 1.5x 1.2x 20% 42% 1.3x 0.3x 30% 44% Consistent top returns among peers: SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance5,6,7 Secondary funds: Net IRRto limited partners8 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 04 05 Upper Qu
OF II and SOF III performance against one benchmark only; quartiles may differ when compared to other benchmarking sources. SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III data is not included in the data set used to calculate the benchmark data. (6) Information presented in this chart is based on the unaudited result
in Capital; IRR = Internal Rate of Return. STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL 16 EFTA01398169 Greg Martin Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance1,2,3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Lower Quartile 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 0% 5%
SOF II and SOF III performance against one benchmark only; quartiles may differ when compared to other benchmarking sources. SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III data is not included in the data set used to calculate the benchmark data. (2) Information presented in this chart is based on the unaudited result
ernal Rate of Return. STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL 16 EFTA01396809 GLDUS126 Pacific Life Insurance Co Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance1,2,3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Lower Quartile 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 0% 5%
SOF II and SOF III performance against one benchmark only; quartiles may differ when compared to other benchmarking sources. SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III data is not included in the data set used to calculate the benchmark data. (2) Information presented in this chart is based on the unaudited result
RR = Internal Rate of Return. STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL 16 EFTA01397482 GLDUS127 Annandale Capital Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance1,2,3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Lower Quartile 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 0% 5%
SOF II and SOF III performance against one benchmark only; quartiles may differ when compared to other benchmarking sources. SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III data is not included in the data set used to calculate the benchmark data. (2) Information presented in this chart is based on the unaudited result
tal; IRR = Internal Rate of Return. STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL 16 EFTA01396132 GLDUS125 Gerald Ford Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance1,2,3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Lower Quartile 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 0% 5%
SOF II and SOF III performance against one benchmark only; quartiles may differ when compared to other benchmarking sources. SOF, SOF D, SOF II and SOF III data is not included in the data set used to calculate the benchmark data. (2) Information presented in this chart is based on the unaudited result
Entities connected to both Cambridge Associates' and SOF III
Glendower
LOCATIONSOF IV
ORGANIZATIONDeutsche Asset & Wealth Management
ORGANIZATIONGlendower Capital
ORGANIZATIONSecondary Opportunities Fund IV
ORGANIZATION
Prince Charles
PERSONPartner & CIO
ORGANIZATIONABN Amro
ORGANIZATION
J. Robert Oppenheimer
PERSONCDB Web Tech
ORGANIZATIONthe Private Placement Memorandum
ORGANIZATIONHistorical
ORGANIZATION
General Electric
ORGANIZATION
Financial Services
ORGANIZATIONthe Securities and Exchange Commission
ORGANIZATION
George Soros
PERSON
Abu Dhabi
LOCATIONGallo & Co.
ORGANIZATIONChi Cheung
PERSONDeirdre Davies
PERSON