5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
GLDUS132 EverWatch Financial Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%
on St':rtr. s or s I arid SO)- III performarce aghast one henchdrark a=y; quertrea may differ when cornPared to other benchniarkinq soirees. SOF. SOF J. SCir ri and SOF Ill data snot included in Ws data set ised to calculate the berictiriait data (21 Interne lion vest:raid in this chart its based an the Leau
GLD0S183 Dimension Capdal Management Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%
mparison of sor s arid SOF performs-te against one benchmark a=y; quart*ee may differ When bon1Pared to other Percher:Joking soirees. S we OF. SOF J. SCir ri and SOF Ili data isnot included in the data set used to calculate the berichnlaitt data (21 +-damnation veseirted in this chart its based on the mar
GLD0S125 Gerald Ford Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%
.1n Si SOF. son s I arid SOF performance against one benchmark a=y;quart*ea MaY differ When ocifillsred to other benchmarking sotates. S we OF. SOF J. SCir ri and SO+ Ili data son included in Ws data set reed to calculatethe SeriChltaitt data (21 +damnation yes/sited in this chart is based on the marched r
GL0US144 Glenn Warren Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%
i.‘n son sC,F I arid SO)- III performarce against one benchmark a=y; quad*eS may differ when coral-Seed to ether benohnuirking soirees. S ra OF. SOF J. SCir ri and SOF data isnot included in the data set reed to calculate the SeriChltaitt data (21 Inlormation vescirted in this chart ie based an the waudted
GL0US140 Lawrence Hirsch Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%
: or r. s s I I arid SO)- III performa e agarrst one benchmark a=y; quedfee may differ When swill:cued to other benchnuirking sorates. S ra OF. SOF J. SCir ri and SOF Ili data isnot included in the data set used to calculate the benchmark data (21 Information yes/sated in this chart ie bused an the urauelt
Entities connected to both Cambridge Associates' and SOF J. SCir ri
Glendower
LOCATIONCambridge Assoaates
LOCATIONSOF Ili
ORGANIZATIONthe Gler4ower SOF Team
ORGANIZATIONSeriChltaitt
ORGANIZATIONthe Sallower SOF Team
ORGANIZATIONES(11 SOF Fund
ORGANIZATION