3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
GLDUS133 Georgetown University Endowment Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%
. s SDF II arid SO)- III performaivre against one benchmark only: quart*es may differ when corarileed to ether benctereirking seines. SOF. ra UF. SOF J. SCir it and SOF data snot included in IF* data sad reed to calculate the beittirialk data (21 Information veserted in this chair is based an the inauelt
GLDUS139 Third Lake Capital Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%
on or s s I I arid SO)- III performa e against one benchMark OnlY: quait*ee may <Idler When comb:reed to other bench.marking soirees. S ra OF. SOF J. SCir and SOF Ili data snot included in Iv* data set teed to calculatethe berichnlait data (2) Inlormation yes/sited in this chair It based on the inaudte
GLOUS142 Ironsides Asset Mgmt Consistent top returns among peers SOF Funds vs Cambridge Associates' secondary funds performance' 7'3 Secondary funds: Net IRR4 to limited partners Secondary funds: Net multiples to limited partners 50% - 45% - 40%
anSen of or s SOF I I arid SO)- di uerformarce against one benchmark a=y; quest*eS may differ When oorneared to ether benohniatkin9 soirees. SOF. SOF J. SCir und SOF data is non included in the date sew reed to calculate the beittillaitt data (21 Inlornielion presented in this chair is based on the resu
Entities connected to both Cambridge Associates' and SOF J. SCir