3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
h my oral redemption request was in oct, and the written reduced demand o= NOV. 13,schulte had a meeting in sept in which glenn attended, that infor=ed Zwirn and Glenn of the problem in detail. ( wendall knows this!)/ =1 am aware of the issue being legal vs moral duty. However, the legal is =bundantly cle
al is =bundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only=what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condr=n that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as=a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desi
h my oral redemption request was in oct, and the written reduced demand o= NOV. 13,schulte had a meeting in sept in which glenn attended, that infor=ed Zwirn and Glenn of the problem in detail. ( wendall knows this!)/ =1 am aware of the issue being legal vs moral duty. However , the legal is =bundantly cl
al is =bundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only=what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condr=n that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as=a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desi
h my oral redemption request was in oct, and the written reduced demand o= NOV. 13,schulte had a meeting in sept in which glenn attended, that infor=ed Zwirn and Glenn of the problem in detail. ( wendall knows this!)/ =1 am aware of the issue being legal vs moral duty. However , the legal is =bundantly cl
al is =bundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only=what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condr=n that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as=a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desi
Entities connected to both ed Zwirn and Condr