Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
diction. 2. There is complete diversity among the real parties to this controversy. Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity. Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 187 (1990) ("Since its enactment, we have interpreted the diversity statute to require `complete diversity' of citizenship."
Southern District of Florida. A state-court case is properly removable when "it could have been brought, originally, in a federal district court." Lincoln Prop. Co. v. Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 83 (2005) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a)). This case was originally filed in federal district court, and it is the same case to
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
diction. 2. There is complete diversity among the real parties to this controversy. Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity. Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 187 (1990) ("Since its enactment, we have interpreted the diversity statute to require 'complete diversity' of citizenship."
Southern District of Florida. A state-court case is properly removable when "it could have been brought, originally, in a federal district court." Lincoln Prop. Co. v. Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 83 (2005) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a)). This case was originally filed in federal district court, and it is the same case to
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
diction. 2. There is complete diversity among the real parties to this controversy. Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity. Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 187 (1990) ("Since its enactment, we have interpreted the diversity statute to require `complete diversity' of citizenship."
Southern District of Florida. A state-court case is properly removable when "it could have been brought, originally, in a federal district court." Lincoln Prop. Co. v. Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 83 (2005) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a)). This case was originally filed in federal district court, and it is the same case to
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
diction. 2. There is complete diversity among the real parties to this controversy. Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity. Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 187 (1990) ("Since its enactment, we have interpreted the diversity statute to require `complete diversity' of citizenship."
Southern District of Florida. A state-court case is properly removable when "it could have been brought, originally, in a federal district court." Lincoln Prop. Co. v. Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 83 (2005) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a)). This case was originally filed in federal district court, and it is the same case to
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (146)
Entities connected to both Arkoma and Lincoln Prop. Co.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON6 w/ Arkoma·4 w/ Lincoln
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON6 w/ Arkoma·4 w/ Lincoln
Kenneth Marra
PERSON6 w/ Arkoma·4 w/ Lincoln
the United States District Court
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Arkoma·4 w/ Lincoln
the Southern District
LOCATION6 w/ Arkoma·4 w/ Lincoln
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON6 w/ Arkoma·4 w/ Lincoln
Goldberger & Weiss
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Arkoma·4 w/ Lincoln
CA
Carden
PERSON6 w/ Arkoma·4 w/ Lincoln
ST
Strawbridge
PERSON6 w/ Arkoma·4 w/ Lincoln
MacGinnitie
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Arkoma·4 w/ Lincoln
Marc Rich
PERSON5 w/ Arkoma·4 w/ Lincoln
HE
Herman
PERSON5 w/ Arkoma·4 w/ Lincoln
Abraham Lincoln
PERSON5 w/ Arkoma·4 w/ Lincoln
Michael Douglas
PERSON5 w/ Arkoma·4 w/ Lincoln
MySpace
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Arkoma·4 w/ Lincoln
the Police Department
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Arkoma·4 w/ Lincoln
Wellington
LOCATION5 w/ Arkoma·4 w/ Lincoln
Judith F. Consor
PERSON5 w/ Arkoma·4 w/ Lincoln
WR
Wright
PERSON5 w/ Arkoma·4 w/ Lincoln
RC
Robert D. Critton
PERSON5 w/ Arkoma·4 w/ Lincoln