Epstein Secrets

her sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc., 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are int

d traveled from Teterboro, New Jersey to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulestream 75 EFTA02857594 aircraft owned by Defendant, HYPERION, AIR, INC. 76. On January 1, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN, and traveled from Anguilla, British West Indies.to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream

ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are in

efendants EPSTEIN and traveled from Teterboro, New Jersey to Palm Beach County, Florida aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. 11. On June 3, 2004, Defendant caused one or more telephone calls to be made to a telephone used by Jane Doe #6. 12. On June 4, 2004, Defendants

ther sections of the Mann Act shows that Congress likewise did not intend to require proof of knowledge of age to violate those sections either. See Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., Inc. , 513 U.S. 561, 570 (1995) (noting the "normal rule of statutory construction" that "identical words used in different parts of the same act are in

fendants EPSTEIN and traveled from Teterboro, New Jersey to Palm Beach County, Florida, aboard the Gulfstream aircraft owned by Defendant HYPERION AIR, INC. #. On or about May 6, 2005, Defendants EPSTEIN and caused Jane Doe #3 to make a telephone call to 917-855-3363. #. On or about May 6, 2005, Defenda