Epstein Secrets

r error. 2422(b) Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting 55 EFTA00226341 COURT . CASES FACILITY FACTS/COMMUNICATION CHARGE ***U.S. I Hornaday, Internet Internet chat room "Loving Families" 2422(6); 392 F.3d 1306 (11th Cir. 2004) Sting where people communicate about having sex with c

.g., U.S. Pisman, 443 F.3d 912 (7th Cir. 2006) (2423(b) conspiracy); U.S. Pipkins, es al., 378 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2004 (RICO conspiracy); U.S. Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (1 1 th Cir. 2 4) (conspiracy charge was error); U.S. I Jackson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33639 (D. Neb. 2007) (state conspiracy charge

e component; all elements of 2422 & 2423 satisfied. 2422(6); 2423 Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting by private organization U.S. I Holloman, Slip Copy, 2006 WL 2796641 (E.D. Va. 2006) Slip Copy No Information No information available. Indictment not scressible; no media information

., U.S. I Pisman, 443 F.3d 912 (7th Cir. 2006) (2423(b) conspiracy); U.S Pipkins, et al., 378 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2004) (RICO conspiracy); U.S. ~ Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (1 1 `11 Cir. 2004) (conspiracy charge was error); U.S. I. Jackson, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 336 9 (D. Neb. 2007) (state conspiracy char

ce component; all elements of 2422 & 2423 satisfied. 2422(b); 2423 Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting by private organization U.S I Holloman, Slip Copy, 2006 WL 2796641 (ED. Va. 2006) Slip Copy No Information No information available. Indictment not accessible; no media information.

U.S. v. Pisman, 443 F.3d 912 (sr Cir. 2006) (2423(b) conspiracy); U.S. v. Pipkins, et al., 378 F.3d 1281 (11th Cir. 2004) (RICO conspiracy); U.S. v. Hornaday, 392 F.3d 1306 (11`" Cir. 2004) (conspiracy charge was error); EFTA00079414 U.S. v. Jackson. 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33639 (D. Neb. 2007) (state con

e component; all elements of 2422 & 2423 satisfied. 2422(b); 2423 Not Consummated Showed up for meeting Sting by private organization U.S v. Holloman, Slip Copy, 2006 WL 2796641 (E.D. Va. 2006) Slip Copy No Information No specific information available. Defendant sought recusal because judge