4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
dismiss a complaint "when, on the basis of a dispositive issue of law, no construction of the factual allegations will support a cause of action." Marshall County Bd. of Ethic. v. Marshal County Gas Dist., 992 F.2d 1171, 1174 (11th Cir. 1993). "[T]o survive a 2 EFTA00221978 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 40
here are no allegations that Jane Doe was placed in any fear of imminent peril. See Gatto v. Pubblx Supermarket, Inc., 387 So. 2d 377, 379 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (holding that where there was no evidence to show that Gatto was placed in fear of imminent peril, there was no assault). In fact, the plaintiff do
dismiss a complaint "when, on the basis of a dispositive issue of law, no construction of the factual allegations will support a cause of action." Marshall County Bd. of Ethic. v. Marshal County Gas Dist., 992 F.2d 1171, 1174 (11th Cir. 1993). "[T]o survive a 2 EFTA00222421 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 40
here are no allegations that Jane Doe was placed in any fear of imminent peril. See Gatto v. Pubblx Supermarket, Inc., 387 So. 2d 377, 379 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (holding that where there was no evidence to show that Gatto was placed in fear of imminent peril, there was no assault). In fact, the plaintiff do
dismiss a complaint "when, on the basis of a dispositive issue of law, no construction of the factual allegations will support a cause of action." Marshall County Bd. of Ethic. v. Marshal County Gas Dist., 992 F.2d 1171, 1174 (11th Cir. 1993). "[T]o survive a 2 EFTA00222724 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 40
here are no allegations that Jane Doe was placed in any fear of imminent peril. See Gatto v. Pubblx Supermarket, Inc., 387 So. 2d 377, 379 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (holding that where there was no evidence to show that Gatto was placed in fear of imminent peril, there was no assault). In fact, the plaintiff do
dismiss a complaint "when, on the basis of a dispositive issue of law, no construction of the factual allegations will support a cause of action." Marshall County Bd. of Educ. I. Marshal County Gas Dist, 992 F.2d 1171, 1174 (11th Cir. 1993). "[T]o survive a 2 EFTA00175611 Case 9:08-cv-80 '-KAM Document 40
ere are no allegations that Jane Doe was placed in any fear of imminent peril. See Gatto 's. Publix Supermarket, Inc., 387 So. 2d 377, 379 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (holding that where there was no evidence to show that Gatto was placed in fear of imminent peril, there was no assault). In fact, the plaintiff do
Entities connected to both Marshall County Bd and DCA 1980
Robert D. Critton
PERSONCoconut Grove
LOCATIONFerre
PERSONGatto
PERSONMiami Herald Publ'g Co.
ORGANIZATIONJack Goldberger
PERSONMarshal County Gas Dist
ORGANIZATIONRochester Med
ORGANIZATION
Bill Richardson
PERSON
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONIndecent Exposure
PERSONHome Assurance Co.
ORGANIZATIONJane Doe
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSONMichael J. Pike
PERSONDirectTV, Inc.
ORGANIZATIONFinnegan
PERSONChoice, Inc.
ORGANIZATIONPlaza Materials Corp.
ORGANIZATION
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON