Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
motion to dismiss "automatically extends its time to answer . . . until after the court has ruled on [its] motion to dismiss"); Finnegan v. Univ. of Rochester Med. Ctr., 180 F.R.D. 247, 249 (W.D.N.Y. 1998) (concluding "that the filing of a motion that only addresses part of a complaint suspends the time to re
ly addresses part of a complaint suspends the time to respond to the entire complaint, not just to the claims that are the subject of the motion"); Schwartz v. Berry College, Inc., No. Civ.A. 4:96CV338-HLM, 1997 WL 579166, *1 (N.D. Ga. July 3, 1997) (noting that there is significant case law to support the position that "when
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
motion to dismiss "automatically extends its time to answer . . . until after the court has ruled on [its] motion to dismiss"); Finnegan v. Univ. of Rochester Med. Ctr., 180 F.R.D. 247, 249 (W.D.N.Y. 1998) (concluding "that the filing of a motion that only addresses part of a complaint suspends the time to re
ly addresses part of a complaint suspends the time to respond to the entire complaint, not just to the claims that are the subject of the motion"); Schwartz v. Berry College, Inc., No. Civ.A. 4:96CV338-HLM, 1997 WL 579166, *1 (N.D. Ga. July 3, 1997) (noting that there is significant case law to support the position that "when
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
motion to dismiss "automatically extends its time to answer . . . until after the court has ruled on [its] motion to dismiss"); Finnegan v. Univ. of Rochester Med. Ctr., 180 F.R.D. 247, 249 (W.D.N.Y. 1998) (concluding "that the filing of a motion that only addresses part of a complaint suspends the time to re
ly addresses part of a complaint suspends the time to respond to the entire complaint, not just to the claims that are the subject of the motion"); Schwartz v. Berry College, Inc., No. Civ.A. 4:96CV338-HLM, 1997 WL 579166, *1 (N.D. Ga. July 3, 1997) (noting that there is significant case law to support the position that "when
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (39)
Entities connected to both Rochester Med and Schwartz v. Berry College, Inc.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON4 w/ Rochester·3 w/ Schwartz
George W. Bush
PERSON4 w/ Rochester·3 w/ Schwartz
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON4 w/ Rochester·3 w/ Schwartz
Bill Richardson
PERSON4 w/ Rochester·3 w/ Schwartz
Kenneth Marra
PERSON4 w/ Rochester·3 w/ Schwartz
Plaza Materials Corp.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Rochester·3 w/ Schwartz
Choice, Inc.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Rochester·3 w/ Schwartz
FI
Finnegan
PERSON4 w/ Rochester·3 w/ Schwartz
DirectTV, Inc.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Rochester·3 w/ Schwartz
MP
Michael J. Pike
PERSON4 w/ Rochester·3 w/ Schwartz
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON4 w/ Rochester·3 w/ Schwartz
Home Assurance Co.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Rochester·3 w/ Schwartz
IE
Indecent Exposure
PERSON4 w/ Rochester·3 w/ Schwartz
Marshall County Bd
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Rochester·3 w/ Schwartz
Marshal County Gas Dist
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Rochester·3 w/ Schwartz
Miami Herald Publ'g Co.
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Rochester·3 w/ Schwartz
Say. & Loan Assoc
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Rochester·3 w/ Schwartz
DCA 1980
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Rochester·3 w/ Schwartz
W. Fla.
LOCATION4 w/ Rochester·3 w/ Schwartz
Coconut Grove
LOCATION4 w/ Rochester·3 w/ Schwartz