Epstein Secrets

e 12(b)(6) motion, I ac- cept all allegations in the complaint as true, and draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the non-moving party. In re Rockefeller Ctr. Props., Int, 311 F.3d 198, 215 (3d Cir.2002). "The inquiry is not whether plaintiffs will ultimately prevail in a trial on the merits, but whethe

B's relationship with MG was dis- lished that there exists no private right of action for claims that are within the purview of the [Martin] Act.); Granite Partners, L.P. Bear, Stearns, & Co., Inc., 17 F.Supp.2d 275, 291 (S.D.N.Y.1998) (same); Deutsch I Inte- grated Barter Ina Inc. 700 F.Supp. 194 (S.D.N.Y.I98

that would accompany 'the first paragraph of any newspaper story—that is, the 'who, what, when, where and how' of the events at issue." In re Rockefeller Ctr. Props.. Inc.. 311 F.3d at 217 (quoting In re Burlington, 114 F.3d at 1422). In Count I, plaintiffs allege that the defendants' conduct "constituted

Sept. 10, 2002) Cult is well established that there exists no private right of action for claims that are within the purview of the [Martin] Act.); Granite Partners, L.P. v. Bear, Steams, & Co., Inc., 17 F.Supp.2d 275, 291 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) (same); Deutsch v. Integrated Barter Ina Inc. 700 F.Supp. 194 (S.D.N.Y.19

an increased measure of protection for their reputations, and reduce[] the number of frivolous suits brought solely to extract settlements." In re Rockefeller Ctr. Props., Inc., 311 F.3d at 215 (quoting In re Burlington Coat Factory Sec. Litig., 114 F.3d at 1418). "Rule 9(b) requires a plaintiff to plead (1)

pt. 10, 2002) ("(Ilt is well established that there exists no private right of action for claims that are within the purview of the (Martin] Act.); Granite Partners, L.P. v. Bear, Stearns, & Co., Inc., 17 F. Supp. 2d 275, 291 (S.D.N.Y. 1998) (same); Deutsch v. Integrated Barter Int'l, Inc. 700 F. Supp. 194 (S.D