Epstein Secrets

fendant, V. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Counter-Defendant's, Jeffrey Epstein's, Motion for Fees and Costs filed on June 2, 2014. A hearing was held on December 8, 2014, at which 't counsel presented argumen

0617979 Epstein now seeks fees and cogs pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 768.79 end Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442. Edwards argues that the Offer of Judgment was not valid and therefore Epstein is not entitled to fees and costs. H. ANALYSIS The requirements for a valid proposal for settlement are set fo

fendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Counter-Defendant's, Jeffrey Epstein's, Motion for Fees and Costs filed on June 2, 2014. A hearing was held on December 8, 2014, at which counsel presented argument on

308353 Epstein now seeks fees and costs pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 768.79 and Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442. Edwards argues that the Offer of Judgment was not valid and therefore Epstein is not entitled to fees and costs. II. ANALYSIS The requirements for a valid proposal for settlement are set f

nt, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. / ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR FEES AND COSTS THIS CAUSE came before the Court on Counter-Defendant's, Jeffrey Epstein's, Motion for Fees and Costs filed on June 2, 2014. A hearing was held on December 8, 2014, at which counsel presented argument on

308358 Epstein now seeks fees and costs pursuant to Florida Statutes Section 768.79 and Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442. Edwards argues that the Offer of Judgment was not valid and therefore Epstein is not entitled to fees and costs. IL ANALYSIS The requirements for a valid proposal for settlement are set fo