Epstein Secrets

CEF DOC. NC. INDEX NO. 159224/2016 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/05/2020 Page 1 April 9, 2019 `SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SHELDON BARR and THOMAS GARDNER, -against- CITY OF NEW YORK and LLC, Plaintiffs, Defendants, INDEX NO.: 159225/2010 535 Fifth Avenue New York, New York Ap

ramar Project? A. Again, I have not seen this document, but actually it seems to be as you described it. Q. At that time the principal place of Terramar Project was at ew York, New York? A. Again, it was just the address that we had of convenience. Q. Did you have another address for the Terramar Proj

received and marked as Plaintiff's Exhibit 1 for identification, as of this date, by the reporter.) Q. In 2012 the principal place of business Terramar Project was located at New York, New York? A. Again. That would be just an address of convenience, but yes. Q. In 2013, was the principal place of bus

F DOC. NO. 1:2 INDEX NO. 159224/2016 RECEIVEDg e NYSCEF: 03/05/2020 Pa April 9, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SHELDON BARR and THOMAS GARDNER, Plaintiffs, -against- CITY OF NEW YORK and 116 EAST 65TH STREET, LLC, Defendants, INDEX NO.: 159225/2010 535 Fifth Avenue

ramar Project? A. Again, I have not seen this document, but actually it seems to be as you described it. Q. At that time the principal place of Terramar Project was at 116 East 65th Street, New York, New York? A. Again, it was just the address that we had of convenience. Q. Did you have another address

received and marked as Plaintiff's Exhibit 11 for identification, as of this date, by the reporter.) Q. In 2012 the principal place of business Terramar Project was located at 116 East 65th Street, New York, New York? A. Again. That would be just an address of convenience, but yes. Q. In 2013, was the p

C. NO. 113 INDEX NO. 159224/2016 RECEIVEDg e NYSCEF: 03/05/2020 Pa 1 April 9, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SHELDON BARR and THOMAS GARDNER, Plaintiffs, -against- CITY OF NEW YORK and 116 EAST 65TH STREET, LLC, Defendants, INDEX NO.: 159225/2010 535 Fifth Avenue

ramar Project? A. Again, I have not seen this document, but actually it seems to be as you described it. Q. At that time the principal place of Terramar Project was at 116 East 65th Street, New York, New York? A. Again, it was just the address that we had of convenience. Q. Did you have another address

received and marked as Plaintiff's Exhibit 11 for identification, as of this date, by the reporter.) Q. In 2012 the principal place of business Terramar Project was located at 116 East 65th Street, New York, New York? A. Again. That would be just an address of convenience, but yes. Q. In 2013, was the p