Epstein Secrets

courts placed emphasis on the public interest in ensuring that extradition arrangements were honoured and in ensuring that serious allegations were tried63. 31. As to oppression, the graver the offence the higher the threshold for oppression". Given the seriousness of the offences in Ms Maxwell's case,

ed value" when considering the facts of individual cases: Stehlins v Government of Latvia [2006] EWHC 1272 (Admin), para. 13. 67 Gomes para. 36 and Lisowski-v-Regional Court of Bialystock (Poland) [2006] EWHC 3227 (Admin), para. 9. 67 Gomes para. 36. " Woodcock v Government of New Zealand [2004] 1 WLR 47, para. 29; Gomes, para. 32; L

courts placed emphasis on the public interest in ensuring that extradition arrangements were honoured and in ensuring that serious allegations were tried63. 31. As to oppression, the graver the offence the higher the threshold for oppression". Given the seriousness of the offences in Ms Maxwell's case,

ed value" when considering the facts of individual cases: Stehlins v Government of Latvia [2006] EWHC 1272 (Admin), para. 13. 67 Gomes para. 36 and Lisowski-v-Regional Court of Bialystock (Poland) [2006] EWHC 3227 (Admin), para. 9. 67 Gomes para. 36. " Woodcock v Government of New Zealand [2004] 1 WLR 47, para. 29; Gomes, para. 32; L

courts placed emphasis on the public interest in ensuring that extradition arrangements were honoured and in ensuring that serious allegations were tried63. 31. As to oppression, the graver the offence the higher the threshold for oppression". Given the seriousness of the offences in Ms Maxwell's case,

ed value" when considering the facts of individual cases: Stehlins v Government of Latvia [2006] EWHC 1272 (Admin), para. 13. 67 Gomes para. 36 and Lisowski-v-Regional Court of Bialystock (Poland) [2006] EWHC 3227 (Admin), para. 9. 67 Gomes para. 36. " Woodcock v Government of New Zealand [2004] 1 WLR 47, para. 29; Gomes, para. 32; L