Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ealed and released to the public. The Court finds no justification to keep these documents under seal. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion to File Under Seal is DENIED. The Clerk shall UNSEAL docket entries 29 and 30 and make them available for public inspection through CM/ECF at the earliest
L.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon I. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere wi
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ealed and released to the public. The Court finds no justification to keep these documents under seal. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion to File Under Seal is DENIED. The Clerk shall UNSEAL docket entries 29 and 30 and make them available for public inspection through CM/ECF at the earliest
L.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon I. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere wi
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ealed and released to the public. The Court finds no justification to keep these documents under seal. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion to File Under Seal is DENIED. The Clerk shall UNSEAL docket entries 29 and 30 and make them available for public inspection through CM/ECF at the earliest
L.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon I. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere wi
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ealed and released to the public. The Court finds no justification to keep these documents under seal. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion to File Under Seal is DENIED. The Clerk shall UNSEAL docket entries 29 and 30 and make them available for public inspection through CM/ECF at the earliest
L.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon I. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere wi
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (98)
Entities connected to both Defendant's Motion to File and I. Warner Communications
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON6 w/ Defendant's·4 w/ I.
the Clerk's Office
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Defendant's·4 w/ I.
Cynthia Nixon
PERSON6 w/ Defendant's·4 w/ I.
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON6 w/ Defendant's·4 w/ I.
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON6 w/ Defendant's·4 w/ I.
Noriega
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Defendant's·4 w/ I.
CH
Chambers
PERSON6 w/ Defendant's·4 w/ I.
Kenneth Marra
PERSON6 w/ Defendant's·4 w/ I.
the United States District Court
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Defendant's·3 w/ I.
FLSD Docket 08/05/2008
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Defendant's·2 w/ I.
GR
Graddick
PERSON3 w/ Defendant's·3 w/ I.
JN
JANE DOE NO
PERSON4 w/ Defendant's·2 w/ I.
HE
Herman
PERSON2 w/ Defendant's·2 w/ I.
FBI
ORGANIZATION2 w/ Defendant's·2 w/ I.
FI
Filer
PERSON2 w/ Defendant's·2 w/ I.
Athens
LOCATION2 w/ Defendant's·2 w/ I.
Michael Douglas
PERSON2 w/ Defendant's·2 w/ I.
Russell Simmons
PERSON2 w/ Defendant's·2 w/ I.
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION2 w/ Defendant's·2 w/ I.
Coconut Grove
LOCATION2 w/ Defendant's·2 w/ I.