Epstein Secrets

are produced, there will be no adequate remedy. L JURISDICTION Mr. Epstein seeks to invoke the certiorari jurisdiction of this Court pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.030(bX2XA) and 9.100. Certiorari review is appropriate where, as here, an order unsealing a court record departs from the essential req

ed in the court's Order of June 25, 2009. It is the position of Defendant Epstein that the order on today's Motion to Stay should simply state that the Defendant's Motion to Stay is denied. In this way, the court's order of June 25, 2009 on the merits of the issue and the order of the court One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400

are produced, there will be no adequate remedy. I. JURISDICTION Mr. Epstein seeks to invoke the certiorari jurisdiction of this Court pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.030(bX2)(A) and 9.100. Certiorari review is appropriate where, as here, an order unsealing a court record departs from the essential re

ed in the court's Order of June 25, 2009. It is the position of Defendant Epstein that the order on today's Motion to Stay should simply state that the Defendant's Motion to Stay is denied. In this way, the court's order of June 25, 2009 on the merits of the issue and the order of the court One Clearlake Centre, Suite 1400

are produced, there will be no adequate remedy. I. JURISDICTION Mr. Epstein seeks to invoke the certiorari jurisdiction of this Court pursuant to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.030(bX2)(A) and 9.100. Certiorari review is appropriate where, as here, an order unsealing a court record departs from the essential re

ed in the court's Order of June 25, 2009. It is the position of Defendant Epstein that the order on today's Motion to Stay should simply state that the Defendant's Motion to Stay is denied. In this way, the court's order of June 25, 2009 on the merits of the issue and the order of the court One ClearlAke Contre,Suito 1400 2