Epstein Secrets

criminal action is pending until its final adjudication in the trial court. 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k). See aro, John Doe 1 v. Francis, 2005 WL 517847, at •2 (ND. Fla. Feb. 1), 2005) ("the language of 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) is clear that a stay is required in a case such as this where a parallel criminal action

s a victim of an enumerated federal offense under § 2255 and should, therefore, be placed in the same position EFTA00214269 12/26/2007 14:46 FAX KIRKLAIMELLIS 005/006 December 26, 2007 Page 4 the would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted of such an offense. As we discussed last week, it is this re

criminal action is pending until its final adjudication in the trial court. 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k). See aro, John Doe 1 v. Francis, 2005 WL 517847, at •2 (ND. Fla. Feb. 1), 2005) ("the language of 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) is clear that a stay is required in a case such as this where a parallel criminal action

s a victim of an enumerated federal offense under § 2255 and should, therefore, be placed in the same position EFTA00214680 12/26/2007 14:46 FAX KIRKLAIMELLIS 005/006 December 26, 2007 Page 4 the would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted of such an offense. As we discussed last week, it is this re

criminal action is pending until its final adjudication in the trial court. 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k). See also, John Doe II Francis, 2005 WL 517847, at •2 (ND. Fla. Feb. 1), 2005) ("the language of 18 U.S.C. § 3509(k) is clear that a stay is required in a case such as this where a parallel criminal action

s a victim of an enumerated federal offense under § 2255 and should, therefore, be placed in the same position EFTA00221314 12/26/2007 14:46 FAX KIRKLAIMELLIS 005/006 December 26, 2007 Page 4 the would have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted of such an offense. As we discussed last week, it is this re