Epstein Secrets

id. at 9. Further, the Southern District of New York is likely relying upon physical evidence seized in connection with the prior investigation, see Gov't Bail Letter at 6 (discussing "corroborating evidence," including "contemporaneous notes, messages . . . , and call records"). In short, there will be ev

nited States v. Vortis, 785 F.2d 327 (D.C. Cir.1986) (serious intent to flee is an important factor); United States v. Cole, 715 F. Supp. 677, 679 (E.D. Pa.1988) (defendant told undercover agents he would flee if arrested). In fact, Mr. Epstein has displayed long-term, consistent compliance with Court orders

id. at 9. Further, the Southern District of New York is likely relying upon physical evidence seized in connection with the prior investigation, see Gov't Bail Letter at 6 (discussing "corroborating evidence," including "contemporaneous notes, messages . . . , and call records"). In short, there will be ev

nited States v. Vortis, 785 F.2d 327 (D.C. Cir.1986) (serious intent to flee is an important factor); United States v. Cole, 715 F. Supp. 677, 679 (E.D. Pa.1988) (defendant told undercover agents he would flee if arrested). In fact, Mr. Epstein has displayed long-term, consistent compliance with Court orders

id. at 9. Further, the Southern District of New York is likely relying upon physical evidence seized in connection with the prior investigation, see Gov't Bail Letter at 6 (discussing "corroborating evidence," including "contemporaneous notes, messages . . . , and call records"). In short, there will be ev

nited States v. Vortis, 785 F.2d 327 (D.C. Cir.1986) (serious intent to flee is an important factor); United States v. Cole, 715 F. Supp. 677, 679 (E.D. Pa.1988) (defendant told undercover agents he would flee if arrested). In fact, Mr. Epstein has displayed long-term, consistent compliance with Court orders

id. at 9. Further, the Southern District of New York is likely relying upon physical evidence seized in connection with the prior investigation, see Gov't Bail Letter at 6 (discussing "corroborating evidence," including "contemporaneous notes, messages . . . , and call records"). In short, there will be ev

nited States v. Vortis, 785 F.2d 327 (D.C. Cir.1986) (serious intent to flee is an important factor); United States v. Cole, 715 F. Supp. 677, 679 (E.D. Pa.1988) (defendant told undercover agents he would flee if arrested). In fact, Mr. Epstein has displayed long-term, consistent compliance with Court orders