Epstein Secrets

NPA. Contrary to the government's argument, the NPA was not limited to a "list of several dozen victims identified in the prior investigation ...." Gov't Bail Letter at 6-7. Indeed, the NPA contains no "list of several dozen victims" and regardless, the NPA immunized Mr. Epstein from prosecution "for the offense

nited States v. Vortis, 785 F.2d 327 (D.C. Cir.1986) (serious intent to flee is an important factor); United States v. Cole, 715 F. Supp. 677, 679 (E.D. Pa.1988) (defendant told undercover agents he would flee if arrested). In fact, Mr. Epstein has displayed long-term, consistent compliance with Court orders

NPA. Contrary to the government's argument, the NPA was not limited to a "list of several dozen victims identified in the prior investigation ...." Gov't Bail Letter at 6-7. Indeed, the NPA contains no "list of several dozen victims" and regardless, the NPA immunized Mr. Epstein from prosecution "for the offense

nited States v. Vortis, 785 F.2d 327 (D.C. Cir.1986) (serious intent to flee is an important factor); United States v. Cole, 715 F. Supp. 677, 679 (E.D. Pa.1988) (defendant told undercover agents he would flee if arrested). In fact, Mr. Epstein has displayed long-term, consistent compliance with Court orders

NPA. Contrary to the government's argument, the NPA was not limited to a "list of several dozen victims identified in the prior investigation ...." Gov't Bail Letter at 6-7. Indeed, the NPA contains no "list of several dozen victims" and regardless, the NPA immunized Mr. Epstein from prosecution "for the offense

nited States v. Vortis, 785 F.2d 327 (D.C. Cir.1986) (serious intent to flee is an important factor); United States v. Cole, 715 F. Supp. 677, 679 (E.D. Pa.1988) (defendant told undercover agents he would flee if arrested). In fact, Mr. Epstein has displayed long-term, consistent compliance with Court orders

NPA. Contrary to the government's argument, the NPA was not limited to a "list of several dozen victims identified in the prior investigation ...." Gov't Bail Letter at 6-7. Indeed, the NPA contains no "list of several dozen victims" and regardless, the NPA immunized Mr. Epstein from prosecution "for the offense

nited States v. Vortis, 785 F.2d 327 (D.C. Cir.1986) (serious intent to flee is an important factor); United States v. Cole, 715 F. Supp. 677, 679 (E.D. Pa.1988) (defendant told undercover agents he would flee if arrested). In fact, Mr. Epstein has displayed long-term, consistent compliance with Court orders