Epstein Secrets

C■c: Nai=ah Saadiq < <mailto =» Subject: FW: Private and Confi=ential, in response to our meeting. <mailto <mailto: > > »= Erin Ellison Mr. Waldman, Your client, Lawrence Krauss, copied m= on his February 23rd email communication to the Office of Equity an= Inclusion. I am writing to convey the

info Begin forwarded message: To: Lawrence Krauss < Fyi Just got back on wifi and r=ading now <mailto From: Cynthia Jewett < Date: T=: <=span>Adam Waldman < > > C■c: Nai=ah Saadiq < <mailto =» Subject: FW: Private and Confi=ential, in response to our meeting. <mailto <mailto: > > »= Erin Elliso

8 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the c=urt recognized that the employer's response to a notice of charge o= discrimination filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was a=solutely privileged. In Miller v. Servicemaster by Rees, 174 Ariz. at 5=0, 851 P.2d 240, 243 (Ct. App. Div. 1 1993), the court recognized the

ears in the making! April 5.9th 2018 — Visit for more =nfo <https://www.originsl0year.com/> cimage002.png> =/div> Begin forwarded message: From: Adam Waldman Subject: FW: Private and =onfidential, in response to our meeting. Date: February 27, 2018 at 12:28:21 PM =ST To: Lawrence Krauss Fyi Just got b

ck =n wifi and reading now From: =ynthia Jewett <mailto. Date: =uesday, February 27, 2018 at 3:21 PM 2 EFTA_R1_01657477 EFTA02520608 To: =dam Waldman <mailto • = mah Saadiq mailto Subject: =W: Private and Confidential, in response to our meeting. Erin Ellison Mr. Waldman, Your client, Lawren

8 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized =hat the employer's response to a notice of charge of =iscrimination filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission =as absolutely privileged. In Miller v. Servicemaster by Rees, 174 =riz. at 520, 851 P.2d 240, 243 (Ct. App. Div. 1 1993), the court =ecognized the

urple" <mailt =t• Cc: Naimah Saadiq mailto: , Erin Ellison &I mailto: Subject: FW: Private and Confidential, i= response to our meeting. Mr. Waldman, Your client, Lawrence Krauss, copied me on his Febr=ary 23rd email communication to the Office of Equity and Inclusion= I am writing to convey the

Fyi Just got back on wifi and reading now<=u> </rpan> =Able> From= <=span>Cyn=hia Jewett ailt Date: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 3:21=PM To: Adam Waldman <=span style="color:purple" <mailt =t• Cc: Naimah Saadiq mailto: , Erin Ellison &I mailto: Subject: FW: Private and Confidential, i= response

8 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that the employer's response to a notice of charge of discriminatio= filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was absolutely privileged. In Miller v. Servicemaster by Rees, 174 Ariz. at 520, 851 P.2d 240, 243 (Ct. App. Div. 1 1993), the court recognized the

a source by presenting them directly to current and/or former employees or to others. To do so would be to further their libelous=20 agenda, as Mr Waldman has emphasized. In this regard,o cur=ent or former employees about this in the process of carrying out and concluding your investigation. EFTA_R1_0

III <mailt On Feb 27, 2018, at 1:58 PM, Cynthia Jewett wrote: aiv> Thank you. From: Sent: Tuesday, Februar 27 201= 1:55 PM To: C nthia Jewet Adam Waldman >; Naimah Saa=iq =t; Cc: Lawrence Krauss mailto Subject: Fwd: Private an on i enua , in response to our meeting.<=span> =div style="margin:0in

8 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that the employer's response to a notice of charge of discriminatio= filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was absolutely privileged. In Miller v. Servicemaster by R=es, 174 Ariz. at 520, 851 P.2d 240, 243 (Ct. App. Div. 1 1993), the court recognized the

uch a source by presenting them directly to current and/or former employees or to others. To do so would be to further their =ibelous agenda, as Mr Waldman has emphasized. In this regard, I would appreciate seeing copies of the correspondence you might send to =urrent or former employees about this in t

018, at 1:58 PM, =ynthia Jewett ailto Thank you. From: Lawrenc= Krauss [mailto Sent: Tuesday= Februa 27 2018 1:55 PM To: C nthia=Jewett mailt Adam Waldman Naimah =aadiq mailto: Erin Elliso c: awrenc= rauss mailto Subject: Fwd: =rivate an on i entia , in response to our meeting. Dear Cynthia et a

8 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized =hat the employer's response to a notice of charge of =iscrimination filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission =as absolutely privileged. In Miller v. Servicemaster by Rees, 174 =riz. at 520, 851 P.2d 240, 243 (Ct. App. Div. 1 1993), the court =ecognized the

a source by presenting them directly to current and/or former employees or to others. To do so would be to further their libelous=20 agenda, as Mr Waldman has emphasized. In this regard,o cur=ent or former employees about this in the process of carrying out and concluding your investigation. your clie

mailto =/div> From: Lawrence Krauss (mailto Sent: Friday, February 23, 2018 4:19 PM To:</=> Naimah Saadiq «mailto: Cynthia Jewett mailto Cc: Adam Waldman <mailto ; Lawrence Krauss <mailto Subject: Private and Confidential, in response =o our meeting. Dear Naimah et al: Attached you will find a le

8 (Ct= App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that the employer's respo=se to a notice of charge of discrimination filed with the Equal Employment=Opportunity Commission was absolutely privileged. In Miller v. Servicemaster by Rees, 174 Ariz. at 520, 851 P.2d 240, 243 (Ct. App.=Div. 1 1993), the court recognized the

t Date: Tuesday, Febr To: Adam Waldman Cc: Naimah Saari' <mailto mailto Subject: FW: Private and =onfidential, in response to our meeting. Mr. Waldman, Your client, Lawrence =rauss, copied me on his February 23rd email communication to the =ffice of Equity and Inclusion. I am writing to convey the

18 =Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that the employer's =esponse to a notice of charge of discrimination filed with the Equal =mployment Opportunity Commission was absolutely privileged. =n Miller =. Servicemaster by Rees, 174 Ariz. at 520, 851 P.2d =40, 243 (Ct. App. Div. 1 1993), the court recognized the

ch a source by presenting them directly to current and/or former employees or to others. To do so would be to further their libelous =agenda, as Mr Waldman has emphasized. In this regard,=I would appreciate seeing copies of the correspondence you might send to curr=nt or former employees about this in t

Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that the employer's response to a notice of charge of discrimination=20 filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was absolutely privileged. In Miller v. Servicemaster by Ree=, 174 Ariz. at 520, 851 P.2d 240, 243 (Ct. App. Div. 1 1993), the court recognized the

ref="mailto: style="color:purple;text-decorat=on:underline" target="_blank" Subject: FW: Private and Confidential, in resp=nse to our meeting. Mr. Waldman, <=iv style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times=New Roman",serif">Your client, Lawrence Krauss, copied me on =is February 23

8 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that the employ=r's response to a notice of charge of discrimination filed with th= Equal Employment Opportunity Commission was absolutely privileged. =n =i>Miller v. Servicemaster by Rees, 174 Ariz. at 520, 851 P.2d 240, 243 (C=. App. Div. 1 1993), the court recognized t