Epstein Secrets

uch a source by presenting them directly to current and/or former employees or to others. To do so would be to further their =ibelous agenda, as Mr Waldman has emphasized. In this regard, I would appreciate seeing copies of the correspondence you might send to =urrent or former employees about this in t

018, at 1:58 PM, =ynthia Jewett ailto Thank you. From: Lawrenc= Krauss [mailto Sent: Tuesday= Februa 27 2018 1:55 PM To: C nthia=Jewett mailt Adam Waldman Naimah =aadiq mailto: Erin Elliso c: awrenc= rauss mailto Subject: Fwd: =rivate an on i entia , in response to our meeting. Dear Cynthia et a

that employees must be protected from workplace sexual harassment. Cited approvingly, Carey v. Maricopa County, 20=9 WL 750225 (D. Ariz. 2009). Both Paros an= Miller we=e cases concerning discrimination and harassment under Title VII. =n addition to its obligations under Title VII, the University must

=hat employees must be protected from workplace sexual harassment. Cited =pprovingly, Carey v. Maricopa County, 2009 =L 750225 (D. Ariz. 2009). Both Paros and Miller were =ases concerning discrimination and harassment under Title VII. In =ddition to its obligations under Title VII, the University must

C■c: Nai=ah Saadiq < <mailto =» Subject: FW: Private and Confi=ential, in response to our meeting. <mailto <mailto: > > »= Erin Ellison Mr. Waldman, Your client, Lawrence Krauss, copied m= on his February 23rd email communication to the Office of Equity an= Inclusion. I am writing to convey the

info Begin forwarded message: To: Lawrence Krauss < Fyi Just got back on wifi and r=ading now <mailto From: Cynthia Jewett < Date: T=: <=span>Adam Waldman < > > C■c: Nai=ah Saadiq < <mailto =» Subject: FW: Private and Confi=ential, in response to our meeting. <mailto <mailto: > > »= Erin Elliso

ssment as public policy dictated that employees must be protected f=om workplace sexual harassment. Cited approvingly, Carey v. Maricopa County,=/i> Paros and Miller were cases concer=ing discrimination and harassment under Title VII. In addition to its=obligations under Title VII, the University must

ears in the making! April 5.9th 2018 — Visit for more =nfo <https://www.originsl0year.com/> cimage002.png> =/div> Begin forwarded message: From: Adam Waldman Subject: FW: Private and =onfidential, in response to our meeting. Date: February 27, 2018 at 12:28:21 PM =ST To: Lawrence Krauss Fyi Just got b

ck =n wifi and reading now From: =ynthia Jewett <mailto. Date: =uesday, February 27, 2018 at 3:21 PM 2 EFTA_R1_01657477 EFTA02520608 To: =dam Waldman <mailto • = mah Saadiq mailto Subject: =W: Private and Confidential, in response to our meeting. Erin Ellison Mr. Waldman, Your client, Lawren

=hat employees must be protected from workplace sexual harassment. Cited =pprovingly, Carey v. Maricopa County, 2009 =L 750225 (D. Ariz. 2009). Both Paros and Miller were =ases concerning discrimination and harassment under Title VII. In =ddition to its obligations under Title VII, the University must

urple" <mailt =t• Cc: Naimah Saadiq mailto: , Erin Ellison &I mailto: Subject: FW: Private and Confidential, i= response to our meeting. Mr. Waldman, Your client, Lawrence Krauss, copied me on his Febr=ary 23rd email communication to the Office of Equity and Inclusion= I am writing to convey the

Fyi Just got back on wifi and reading now<=u> </rpan> =Able> From= <=span>Cyn=hia Jewett ailt Date: Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 3:21=PM To: Adam Waldman <=span style="color:purple" <mailt =t• Cc: Naimah Saadiq mailto: , Erin Ellison &I mailto: Subject: FW: Private and Confidential, i= response

from workplace sexual EFTA_R1_01657534 EFTA02520649 harassment. Cited approvingly, Carey v. Maricopa County, 2009 WL 750225 (D. Ariz.=2009). Both Paros and Miller were cases concerning discrimination and harassment under Title VII. In=20 addition to its obligations under Title VII, the University m

a source by presenting them directly to current and/or former employees or to others. To do so would be to further their libelous=20 agenda, as Mr Waldman has emphasized. In this regard,o cur=ent or former employees about this in the process of carrying out and concluding your investigation. EFTA_R1_0

III <mailt On Feb 27, 2018, at 1:58 PM, Cynthia Jewett wrote: aiv> Thank you. From: Sent: Tuesday, Februar 27 201= 1:55 PM To: C nthia Jewet Adam Waldman >; Naimah Saa=iq =t; Cc: Lawrence Krauss mailto Subject: Fwd: Private an on i enua , in response to our meeting.<=span> =div style="margin:0in

hat employees must be protected from workplace sexual harassment. Cited approvingly, Carey v. Maricopa County, 2009 WL 750225 (D. Ariz. 2009). Both. Paros and were cases concerning discrimination and harassment under Title VII. In=20 addition to its obligations under Title VII, the University must als

ectly to current and/or former employees or to others. To do so would be to 2 EFTA_R1_01658872 EFTA02521592 further their =ibelous agenda, as Mr Waldman has emphasized. In this regard, I would appreciate seeing copies of the correspondence you might send to =urrent or former employees about this in t

Celebration- Be a part of something 10 years in the making! April =-9th 2018 — Visit for more info <image001.png> Begin forwarded message: From: Adam Waldman =lt <mailto > > Subject: FW: =rivate and Confidential, in response to our meeting. Date: February 27, 2018 =t 12:28:21 PM PST To: Lawrence Kraus

that employees must be protected from workplace sexual harassment. Cited approvingly, Carey v. Maricopa County, 2009 WL =50225 (D. Ariz. 2009). Both Paros and Miller were cases concerning discrimination and harassment under Title VII. =n addition to its obligations under Title VII, the University must

t Date: Tuesday, Febr To: Adam Waldman Cc: Naimah Saari' <mailto mailto Subject: FW: Private and =onfidential, in response to our meeting. Mr. Waldman, Your client, Lawrence =rauss, copied me on his February 23rd email communication to the =ffice of Equity and Inclusion. I am writing to convey the

that employees must be protected =rom workplace sexual harassment. Cited approvingly, Carey v. =aricopa County, 2009 WL 750225 (D. Ariz. =009). Both Paros and Miller were cases concerning =iscrimination and harassment under Title VII. In addition to its =bligations under Title VII, the University must

ch a source by presenting them directly to current and/or former employees or to others. To do so would be to further their libelous =agenda, as Mr Waldman has emphasized. In this regard,=I would appreciate seeing copies of the correspondence you might send to curr=nt or former employees about this in t

that employees must b= protected from workplace sexual harassment. Cited approvingly, Carey v. Maricopa County, 2009 WL 750225 (D. Ari=. 2009). Both Paros and=nbsp;Miller were cases concerning discrimina=ion and harassment under Title VII. In addition to its obligations un=er Title VII, the University

ref="mailto: style="color:purple;text-decorat=on:underline" target="_blank" Subject: FW: Private and Confidential, in resp=nse to our meeting. Mr. Waldman, <=iv style="margin:0in 0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times=New Roman",serif">Your client, Lawrence Krauss, copied me on =is February 23

that employees must be protected from workplace sexual =arassment. Cited approvingly, Carey v. Maricopa County, 2009 WL 750225 (D= Ariz. 2009). Both Paros and Miller were cases concerning discrimi=ation and harassment under Title VII. In addition to its obligations=under Title VII, the University must