3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 6
Mentions
a vote on a plan to extend the unemployment benefit at $200, which will make Democrats go on the record opposing it and force them to explain why. Strassell argues Republicans will lose an election over which part can spend more and should instead use it as an opportunity to highlight their competing vis
ll-house/2020/07/30/c390c488-d286-11ea-9038-af089b63ac21_story.html> (7/30, Sonmez, 14.2M) says "the news deals a blow to the reelection campaign of Schweikert," who "is running unopposed in next week's Republican primary in Arizona's 6th District" but faces "four candidates...seeking the Democratic nomina
-for-rep- schweikerts-campaign-finance> (7/30, Marcos, 2.98M) recounts that "an investigative report released by the Ethics Committee concluded that Schweikert, who has served in the House since 2011, violated campaign finance laws, misused taxpayer funds for unofficial purposes, pressured congressional off
a vote on a plan to extend the unemployment benefit at $200, which will make Democrats go on the record opposing it and force them to explain why. Strassell argues Republicans will lose an election over which part can spend more and should instead use it as an opportunity to highlight their competing vi
that helped him skirt more serious violations." The Washington Post (7/30, Sonmez, 14.2M) says "the news deals a blow to the reelection campaign of Schweikert," who "is running unopposed in next week's Republican primary in Arizona's 6th District" but faces "four candidates...seeking the Democratic nomina
r Schweikert as of mid-July." The Hill (7/30, Marcos, 2.98M) recounts that "an investigative report released by the Ethics Committee concluded that Schweikert, who has served in the House since 2011, violated campaign finance laws, misused taxpayer funds for unofficial purposes, pressured congressional of
a vote on a plan to extend the unemployment benefit at $200, which will make Democrats go on the record opposing it and force them to explain why. Strassell argues Republicans will lose an election over which part can spend more and should instead use it as an opportunity to highlight their competing vi
that helped him skirt more serious violations." The Washington Post (7/30, Sonmez, 14.2M) says "the news deals a blow to the reelection campaign of Schweikert," who "is running unopposed in next week's Republican primary in Arizona's 6th District" but faces "four candidates...seeking the Democratic nomina
r Schweikert as of mid-July." The Hill (7/30, Marcos, 2.98M) recounts that "an investigative report released by the Ethics Committee concluded that Schweikert, who has served in the House since 2011, violated campaign finance laws, misused taxpayer funds for unofficial purposes, pressured congressional of
Entities connected to both Strassell and Schweikert

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
George Mitchell
PERSON
Washington D.C.
LOCATION
Prince Charles
PERSON
Minnesota
LOCATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Paul Ryan
PERSON
Axios
ORGANIZATIONOffice of the Director of National Intelligence
ORGANIZATION
Eric Schmidt
PERSONDavid Schweikert
PERSON
Vladimir Putin
PERSON
Carnegie
ORGANIZATIONFBI
ORGANIZATIONthe Chinese Communist Party
ORGANIZATIONMangan
PERSONOsborn
PERSONKremlin
ORGANIZATION
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
William Barr
PERSON