Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ust be denied, and the Government is instead entitled to summary judgment on that claim. A. The CVRA Did Not Create a Right to Notice of Epstein's State Court Proceedings Although petitioners contend that they had a statutory right to notice of the June 30, 2008 state court proceeding in which Epstein pled guilty to
t proceedings. Indeed, the only trial court other than a federal district court that has been included within the scope of the CVRA's provisions is the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. See 18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)(3). Moreover, under petitioners' argument, state court rulings would be subjected to review by federal courts. See, e.g.,
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ust be denied, and the Government is instead entitled to summary judgment on that claim. A. The CVRA Did Not Create a Right to Notice of Epstein's State Court Proceedings Although petitioners contend that they had a statutory right to notice of the June 30, 2008 state court proceeding in which Epstein pled guilty to
t proceedings. Indeed, the only trial court other than a federal district court that has been included within the scope of the CVRA's provisions is the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. See 18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)(3). Moreover, under petitioners' argument, state court rulings would be subjected to review by federal courts. See. e.g.,
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ust be denied, and the Government is instead entitled to summary judgment on that claim. A. The CVRA Did Not Create a Right to Notice of Epstein's State Court Proceedings Although petitioners contend that they had a statutory right to notice of the June 30, 2008 state court proceeding in which Epstein pled guilty to
t proceedings. Indeed, the only trial court other than a federal district court that has been included within the scope of the CVRA's provisions is the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. See 18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)(3). Moreover, under petitioners' argument, state court rulings would be subjected to review by federal courts. See. e.g.,
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (99)
Entities connected to both State Court Proceedings and the Superior Court of the District of Columbia
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION3 w/ State·6 w/ the
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON3 w/ State·6 w/ the
LB
Leon Black
PERSON3 w/ State·5 w/ the
AG
Ace Greenberg
PERSON3 w/ State·5 w/ the
United States
LOCATION3 w/ State·4 w/ the
H.R.
PERSON3 w/ State·4 w/ the
Oliver Stone
PERSON3 w/ State·4 w/ the
Alexander Acosta
PERSON3 w/ State·4 w/ the
Natalie Portman
PERSON3 w/ State·4 w/ the
New Hampshire
LOCATION3 w/ State·4 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON3 w/ State·4 w/ the
Alberto Gonzales
PERSON3 w/ State·4 w/ the
Anderson
PERSON3 w/ State·4 w/ the
the Criminal Division of the DOJ
ORGANIZATION3 w/ State·3 w/ the
G, K
ORGANIZATION3 w/ State·3 w/ the
Conn. App
ORGANIZATION3 w/ State·3 w/ the
4 Wheat
ORGANIZATION3 w/ State·3 w/ the
Tepper Realty Co.
ORGANIZATION3 w/ State·3 w/ the
Barez
LOCATION3 w/ State·3 w/ the
FISTOS & LEHRMAN
ORGANIZATION3 w/ State·3 w/ the