Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
the facts which petitioners contend are not in dispute, and have controverted those facts in the accompanying Response to Petitioners' Statement of Uncontroverted Facts. Indeed, many of the so-called "facts" are legal conclusions or argument of petitioners' counsel. The undisputed facts establish that the Government
ust be denied, and the Government is instead entitled to summary judgment on that claim. A. The CVRA Did Not Create a Right to Notice of Epstein's State Court Proceedings Although petitioners contend that they had a statutory right to notice of the June 30, 2008 state court proceeding in which Epstein pled guilty to
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
the facts which petitioners contend are not in dispute, and have controverted those facts in the accompanying Response to Petitioners' Statement of Uncontroverted Facts. Indeed, many of the so-called "facts" are legal conclusions or argument of petitioners' counsel. The undisputed facts establish that the Government
ust be denied, and the Government is instead entitled to summary judgment on that claim. A. The CVRA Did Not Create a Right to Notice of Epstein's State Court Proceedings Although petitioners contend that they had a statutory right to notice of the June 30, 2008 state court proceeding in which Epstein pled guilty to
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
the facts which petitioners contend are not in dispute, and have controverted those facts in the accompanying Response to Petitioners' Statement of Uncontroverted Facts. Indeed, many of the so-called "facts" are legal conclusions or argument of petitioners' counsel. The undisputed facts establish that the Government
ust be denied, and the Government is instead entitled to summary judgment on that claim. A. The CVRA Did Not Create a Right to Notice of Epstein's State Court Proceedings Although petitioners contend that they had a statutory right to notice of the June 30, 2008 state court proceeding in which Epstein pled guilty to
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (99)
Entities connected to both Uncontroverted Facts and State Court Proceedings
Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Uncontroverted·3 w/ State
LB
Leon Black
PERSON3 w/ Uncontroverted·3 w/ State
BG
BENJAMIN G. GREENBERG
PERSON3 w/ Uncontroverted·3 w/ State
Natalie Portman
PERSON3 w/ Uncontroverted·3 w/ State
FISTOS & LEHRMAN
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Uncontroverted·3 w/ State
The Eleventh Circuit
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Uncontroverted·3 w/ State
Federal district
LOCATION3 w/ Uncontroverted·3 w/ State
TH
Thune
PERSON3 w/ Uncontroverted·3 w/ State
the Child Exploitation
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Uncontroverted·3 w/ State
AG
Ace Greenberg
PERSON3 w/ Uncontroverted·3 w/ State
New Hampshire
LOCATION3 w/ Uncontroverted·3 w/ State
EN
E. Nesbitt
PERSON3 w/ Uncontroverted·3 w/ State
CO
Comyn
PERSON3 w/ Uncontroverted·3 w/ State
HO
Hoeven
PERSON3 w/ Uncontroverted·3 w/ State
Richard D.
PERSON3 w/ Uncontroverted·3 w/ State
JE
J. Cooke ed
PERSON3 w/ Uncontroverted·3 w/ State
Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Uncontroverted·3 w/ State
the Criminal Division of the DOJ
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Uncontroverted·3 w/ State
G, K
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Uncontroverted·3 w/ State
Conn. App
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Uncontroverted·3 w/ State