Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ch victims can exercise their rights. 161 Cong. Rec. S106 (daily ed. Jan. 8, 2015) (statement of Sen. Feinstein, for herself and for Sens. Portman, Comyn, Gillibrand, and Kirk) (addressing Senate Bill 140, the Combat Human Trafficking Act of 2015, which contained a provision, later incorporated into t
t proceedings. Indeed, the only trial court other than a federal district court that has been included within the scope of the CVRA's provisions is the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. See 18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)(3). Moreover, under petitioners' argument, state court rulings would be subjected to review by federal courts. See, e.g.,
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ch victims can exercise their rights. 161 Cong. Rec. S106 (daily ed. Jan. 8, 2015) (statement of Sen. Feinstein, for herself and for Sens. Portman, Comyn, Gillibrand, and Kirk) (addressing Senate Bill 140, the Combat Human Trafficking Act of 2015, which contained a provision, later incorporated into t
t proceedings. Indeed, the only trial court other than a federal district court that has been included within the scope of the CVRA's provisions is the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. See 18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)(3). Moreover, under petitioners' argument, state court rulings would be subjected to review by federal courts. See. e.g.,
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ch victims can exercise their rights. 161 Cong. Rec. S106 (daily ed. Jan. 8, 2015) (statement of Sen. Feinstein, for herself and for Sens. Portman, Comyn, Gillibrand, and Kirk) (addressing Senate Bill 140, the Combat Human Trafficking Act of 2015, which contained a provision, later incorporated into t
t proceedings. Indeed, the only trial court other than a federal district court that has been included within the scope of the CVRA's provisions is the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. See 18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)(3). Moreover, under petitioners' argument, state court rulings would be subjected to review by federal courts. See. e.g.,
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (107)
Entities connected to both Comyn and the Superior Court of the District of Columbia
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON8 w/ Comyn·6 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Comyn·6 w/ the
LB
Leon Black
PERSON5 w/ Comyn·5 w/ the
United States
LOCATION5 w/ Comyn·4 w/ the
AG
Ace Greenberg
PERSON3 w/ Comyn·5 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON5 w/ Comyn·3 w/ the
Natalie Portman
PERSON4 w/ Comyn·4 w/ the
Alexander Acosta
PERSON3 w/ Comyn·4 w/ the
DW
Daphne Wallace
PERSON3 w/ Comyn·4 w/ the
the District of Columbia
LOCATION4 w/ Comyn·3 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON3 w/ Comyn·4 w/ the
Paul Ryan
PERSON4 w/ Comyn·3 w/ the
Oliver Stone
PERSON3 w/ Comyn·4 w/ the
Anderson
PERSON3 w/ Comyn·4 w/ the
New Hampshire
LOCATION3 w/ Comyn·4 w/ the
Alberto Gonzales
PERSON3 w/ Comyn·4 w/ the
H.R.
PERSON3 w/ Comyn·4 w/ the
Harry Reid
PERSON4 w/ Comyn·3 w/ the
Response and Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Comyn·3 w/ the
JE
J. Cooke ed
PERSON3 w/ Comyn·3 w/ the