Epstein Secrets

rivolous; 17. That the presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a good faith basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 1 I: IS. That MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by JONES, that said funds are hereby frozen and no

y interest in Broward Bank of Commerce; (BM) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Ristorante; (BI5) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Cucina; (B16) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Prime; (BI7) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Cafe Iguana, Pembroke Pines, Florida; (B1

rivolous; 17. That the presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a good faith basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 11: 18. That MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by JONES, that said funds arc hereby frozen and not

ein's equity interest in Broward Bank of Commerce; Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Ristorante; Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Cucina; Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Prime; Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Café Iguana, Pembroke Pines, Florida; Scott W. Rothst

rivolous; 17. That the presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a good faith basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 11; 18. That MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by JONES, that said funds are hereby frozen and not

interest in Broward Bank of Commerce; (B14) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Ristorante; (B15) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Cucina; (BI6) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Primo; (BI7) Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Café Iguana, Pembroke Pines, Florida; (13