Epstein Secrets

process privilege would be a qualified privilege, which would be overridden by the victims' compelling need to obtain the materials here. See, e.g., Newport Pac., Inc. v. County of San Diego, 200 F.R.D. 628, 638-41 (S.D. Cal. 2001) (in action charging county Board of Supervisors with violating Federal Fair

erent power beyond the literal wording of Rule 6(e)(3) to disclose grand jury material" and has properly exercised that power here. United States v. Aisenberg, 358 F.3d 1327, 1347 (11th Cir. 2004). Victims Have Properly Petitioned for the Release of Grand Jury Materials — A litigant can petition for rele

rocess privilege would be a qualified privilege, which would be overridden by the victims' compelling need to obtain the materials here. See, e.g., Newport Pac., Inc.' County of San Diego, 200 F.R.D. 628, 638-41 (S.D. Cal. 2001) (in action charging County with violating the Federal Fair Housing Act, the pl

grand jury materials. • The Court has "inherent power beyond the literal wording of Rule 6(e)(3) to disclose grand jury material," United States. Aisenberg, 358 F.3d 1327, 1347 (11th Cir. 2004), and has properly exercised that power here. • A litigant can petition for release of grand jury materials.

process privilege would be a qualified privilege, which would be overridden by the victims' compelling need to obtain the materials here. See, e.g., Newport Pac., Inc. v. County of San Diego, 200 F.R.D. 628, 638-41 (S.D. Cal. 2001) (in action charging county Board of Supervisors with violating Federal Fair

erent power beyond the literal wording of Rule 6(e)(3) to disclose grand jury material" and has properly exercised that power here. United States v. Aisenberg, 358 F.3d 1327, 1347 (11th Cir. 2004). Victims Have Properly Petitioned for the Release of Grand Jury Materials — A litigant can petition for rele