Epstein Secrets

orm any investigation on the Epstein files? A. SCAROLA: Same objection and instruction. Q. If you're unaware of the existence of the entity called Blue Line Research and Development, LLC, would it be a correct statement that you have never authorized anyone from Blue Line Research to conduct any investigation of

s to confidential communications made in the rendition of legal services to the client. Section 90.502, Fla. Stat.; Southern Bell Tel. & TeL Co. v. Deason, 632 So. 2d 1377 (Fla.1994). Section 90.502 codifies the attorney-client privilege which protects those confidential communications between attorney

of whether they pertain to confidential communications between attorney and client. F1a.R.Civ.P. 1.280(b)(2). See Southern Bell TeL & Tel. Co. v. Deason, 632 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. 1994). The privilege may also protect an attorney's mental impressions which may be disclosed through testimony. Hamilton v.

201; line 4-6. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same instruction. Id. at page 201; line 7-9. Q: If you're unaware of the existence of the entity called Blue Line Research and Development, LLC, would it be a correct statement that you have never authorized anyone from Blue Line Research and Development, LLC, to conduc

e the same or similar information is available through ordinary investigative techniques and discovery procedures.'" Southern Bell TeL & TeL Co. v. Deason, 632 So. 2d 1377, 1384 (Fla. 1994). Here, the information sought by Epstein from Edwards in deposition is not "available through ordinary investiga

201; line 4-6. MR. SCAROLA: Same objection, same instruction. Id. at page 201; line 7-9. Q: If you're unaware of the existence of the entity called Blue Line Research and Development, LLC, would it be a correct statement that you have never authorized anyone from Blue Line Research and Development, LLC, to conduc

ques and 19 Tonja Haddad, P.A. • 315 SE 7th Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00585412 discovery procedures.'" Southern Bell TeL & TeL Co. v. Deason, 632 So. 2d 1377, 1384 (Fla. 1994). Here, the information sought by Epstein from Edwards in deposition is not "available through ordinary investiga