Epstein Secrets

d Procedural History In their second amended complaint, Jeffrey E. Epstein and Financial Trust Company, Inc. ["FTC"] allege that Citibank, N.A. and Citigroup, Inc. [collectively "Citibank"] misrepresented facts and fraudulently r**4371 induced them to borrow $ 10 million to invest in a venture managed by AIG G

n to introduce him to an "exceptional investment opportunity." (Compl. P 13.) In follow-up telephone conversations during that same two week period, Davison and her associates r 5] made additional specific representations about the AIG Investment, without disclosing Citibank and AIG's relationship. Davi

d in plaintiffs favor, and accordingly, bond will be waived. FINANCIAL TRUST COMPANY, INC. and Jeffrey E. Epstein, Plaintiffs, CITIBANK, N.A. and Citigroup, Inc. d/b/a "Citigroup," Defendants. No. CIV.2002-108. District Court, Virgin Islands, D. St. Thomas and St. John. June 19, 2003. Borrowers brought a

naged by MG. (Compl. 1112, 24; Epstein Decl. 118-10; Davison Aft 11 1, 102-18.) According to the plaintiffs, during the negotiations of this deal Davison represented to Epstein that he was "virtually assured of receiving an 18-20% return on [his] investment, with a possible return of as much as 80%"

, Jeffrey E. Epstein ("Epstein") and Financial Trust Company, Inc. ("FTC"] [collectively "plaintiffs"] allege that Citibank, N.A. ("Citibank") and Citigroup, Inc. ["Citigroup"] [collectively "defendants"] misrepresented facts and fraudulently induced them to borrow $10 million to invest in a venture managed b

plaintiffs seek rescission of the promissory note and punitive damages (Counts VI and VII). (Am. Compl. III 45-68.) In April 1999, Dayle Davison ["Davison"], Vice President of Citibank in New York and Epstein's private banker, and other Citibank employees telephoned Epstein while he was in the Virgin

Financial Trust Co. v. Citibank Civil No. 02-108 Memorandum Opinion Page 2 Financial Trust Company, Inc. ["FTC"] allege that Citibank, N.A. and Citigroup, Inc. [collectively "Citibank") misrepresented facts and fraudulently induced them to borrow $ 10 million to invest in a venture managed by AIG Global In

o introduce him to an "exceptional investment opportunity." (Compl. 9f 13.) In follow-up telephone conversations during that same two week period, Davison and her associates made additional specific representations about the AIG Investment, without disclosing Citibank and AIG's relationship. Davison a