Epstein Secrets

Supp. 2d 1213, 1230 (S.D. Fla. 2009) (quoting Gruntal & Co. v. Steinberg, 837 F. Supp. 85, 89 (D.N.J. 1993)). See also, Beazer Homes Corp. v. VMIF/Anden Southbridge Venture, LPI, 235 F. Supp. 2d 485, 494 (E.D. Va. 2002) (finding that a declaration that involves the adjudication of past conduct serves no useful purpose)

that a declaratory judgment may be issued only in the case of an "actual controversy.") (internal citation omitted); see further Nutrasweet Co. v. Ajinomoto Co., 423 F. Supp. 2d 450, 453 (D. Del. 2006) (noting that an action for declaratory judgment may be brought in order to resolve an "actual controversy"

Supp. 2d 1213, 1230 (S.D. Fla. 2009) (quoting Gruntal & Co. v. Steinberg, 837 F. Supp. 85, 89 (D.N.J. 1993)). See also, Beazer Homes Corp. v. VMIF/Anden Southbridge Venture, LPI, 235 F. Supp. 2d 485, 494 (E.D. Va. 2002) (finding that a declaration that involves the adjudication of past conduct serves no useful purpose)

that a declaratory judgment may be issued only in the case of an "actual controversy.") (internal citation omitted); see further Nutrasweet Co. v. Ajinomoto Co., 423 F. Supp. 2d 450, 453 (D. Del. 2006) (noting that an action for declaratory judgment may be brought in order to resolve an "actual controversy"

Supp. 2d 1213, 1230 (S.D. Fla. 2009) (quoting Gruntal & Co. v. Steinberg, 837 F. Supp. 85, 89 (D.N.J. 1993)). See also, Beazer Homes Corp. v. VMIF/Anden Southbridge Venture, LPI, 235 F. Supp. 2d 485, 494 (E.D. Va. 2002) (finding that a declaration that involves the adjudication of past conduct serves no useful purpose)

that a declaratory judgment may be issued only in the case of an "actual controversy.") (internal citation omitted); see further Nutrasweet Co. v. Ajinomoto Co., 423 F. Supp. 2d 450, 453 (D. Del. 2006) (noting that an action for declaratory judgment may be brought in order to resolve an "actual controversy"

Supp. 2d 1213, 1230 (S.D. Fla. 2009) (quoting Gruntal & Co. v. Steinberg, 837 F. Supp. 85, 89 (D.N.J. 1993)). See also, Beazer Homes Corp. v. VMIF/Anden Southbridge Venture, LPI, 235 F. Supp. 2d 485, 494 (E.D. Va. 2002) (finding that a declaration that involves the adjudication of past conduct serves no useful purpose)

that a declaratory judgment may be issued only in the case of an "actual controversy.") (internal citation omitted); see further Nutrasweet Co. v. Ajinomoto Co., 423 F. Supp. 2d 450, 453 (D. Del. 2006) (noting that an action for declaratory judgment may be brought in order to resolve an "actual controversy"