Epstein Secrets

tering into a settlement agreement.")); United States Drier, 682 F. Supp. 2d 417, 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (same); see further United States, BP Prods. N. Am. Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655, 727 (S.D. Tex. 2009) ("The purpose of the conferral right is not to give victims a right to approve or disapprove a proposed

the merits rather than a likelihood of success on the merits. A Choice for Women 1. Butterworth, 54 F. Supp. 2d 1148, 1154 (S.D. Fla. 1998) (citing Amoco Production Co. I. Village of Gambell, 480 U.S. 531, 546 n.12 (1987)). 22 EFTA00205645 • An order from this Court directing an appropriate supervisor from the U

ng into a settlement agreement.")); United States v. Drier, 682 F. Supp. 2d 417, 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (same); see further United States v. BP Prods. N. Am. Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655, 727 (S.D. Tex. 2009) ("The purpose of the conferral right is not to give victims a right to approve or disapprove a proposed

the merits rather than a likelihood of success on the merits. A Choice for Women v. Butterworth, 54 F. Supp. 2d 1148, 1154 (S.D. Fla. 1998) (citing Amoco Production Co. v. Village of Gambell, 480 U.S. 531, 546 n.12 (1987)). 22 EFTA00799516 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Pa

ng into a settlement agreement.")); United States v. Drier, 682 F. Supp. 2d 417, 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (same); see further United States v. BP Prods. N. Am. Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655, 727 (S.D. Tex. 2009) ("The purpose of the conferral right is not to give victims a right to approve or disapprove a proposed

the merits rather than a likelihood of success on the merits. A Choice for Women v. Butterworth, 54 F. Supp. 2d 1148, 1154 (S.D. Fla. 1998) (citing Amoco Production Co. v. Village of Gimbel!, 480 U.S. 531, 546 n.12 (1987)). 22 EFTA00208844 • An order from this Court directing an appropriate supervisor from the U.

ng into a settlement agreement.")); United States v. Drier, 682 F. Supp. 2d 417, 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (same); see further United States v. BP Prods. N. Am. Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655, 727 (S.D. Tex. 2009) ("The purpose of the conferral right is not to give victims a right to approve or disapprove a proposed

the merits rather than a likelihood of success on the merits. A Choice for Women v. Butterworth, 54 F. Supp. 2d 1148, 1154 (S.D. Fla. 1998) (citing Amoco Production Co. v. Village of Gambell, 480 U.S. 531, 546 n.12 (1987)). 22 EFTA00081037 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Pa

ng into a settlement agreement.")); United States v. Drier, 682 F. Supp. 2d 417, 421 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (same); see further United States v. BP Prods. N. Am. Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655, 727 (S.D. Tex. 2009) ("The purpose of the conferral right is not to give victims a right to approve or disapprove a proposed

the merits rather than a likelihood of success on the merits. A Choice for Women v. Butterworth, 54 F. Supp. 2d 1148, 1154 (S.D. Fla. 1998) (citing Amoco Production Co. v. Village of Gambell, 480 U.S. 531, 546 n.12 (1987)). 22 EFTA00795192 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 205-6 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/05/2013 Pa