Epstein Secrets

ery of admissible evidence and the defendants have not made any showing to the contrary, this justification for [discovery] must fail. Id.; accord Reist, 2010 WL 4940096 at *2 (recognizing the "chilling effect" that discovery can have on the willingness of parties to enter into settlement negotiation

r v. National R.R. Corp., 116 507 (MI.1987); to roduct safety assessments, Lloyd v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 74 . 518 .1977); to products liability, Bradley v. Melroe Co., 141 . 1 (1=1992); and to railroad's accident reports because "[a]bsent complete and honest reports, effective accident evaluation may be impaired

very of admissible evidence and the defendants have not made any showing to the contrary, this justification for [discovery) must fail. Id.; accord Reist, 2010 WL 4940096 at '2 (recognizing the chilling effect that discovery can have on the willingness of parties to enter into settlement negotiations

116 F.R.D. 507 (E.D.Pa.1987); to product safety assessments, Lloyd v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 74 F.R.D. 518 (E.D.Tenn.1977); to products liability, Bradley v. Melroe Co., 141 F.R.D. 1 (D.D.C.1992); and EFTA00301920 to railroad's accident reports because (a)bsent complete and honest reports, effective accident eva

ery of admissible evidence and the defendants have not made any showing to the contrary, this justification for [discovery] must fail. Id.; accord Reist, 2010 WL 4940096 at *2 (recognizing the "chilling effect" that discovery can have on the willingness of parties to enter into settlement negotiation

r v. National R.R. Corp., 116 507 (MI.1987); to roduct safety assessments, Lloyd v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 74 . 518 .1977); to products liability, Bradley v. Melroe Co., 141 . 1 (1=1992); and to railroad's accident reports because "[a]bsent complete and honest reports, effective accident evaluation may be impaired