Epstein Secrets

mplaint about either the form or content of that determination. CONCLUSION The judgment of conviction should be affirmed. Respectfully submitted, CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County GINA MIGNOLA DEBORAH'. MORSE Assistant District Attorneys Of Counsel August 2011 -63- EFTA00602404 -

- First Department THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, - against - JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Dc.fendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County Attorney for Respondent One Hogan Place New York, New York 10013 (212) 335-9000 [email protected]

ase and thus posed a significant risk to the community. The court acted correctly, and certainly well within its discretion, when it concluded that the People's stated concerns did not cast any meaningful doubt on the propriety of the Board's recommendation. D. Nor is defendant persuasive when he contends

mplaint about either the form or content of that determination. CONCLUSION The judgment of conviction should be affirmed. Respectfully submitted, CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County GINA MIGNOLA DEBORAH L. MORSE Assistant District Attorneys Of Counsel August 2011 -63- EFTA00792566

- First Department THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, - against - JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Dcfendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County Attorney for Respondent One Hogan Place New York, New York 10013 (212) 335-9000 [email protected]

ase and thus posed a significant risk to the community. The court acted correctly, and certainly well within its discretion, when it concluded that the People's stated concerns did not cast any meaningful doubt on the propriety of the Board's recommendation. D. Nor is defendant persuasive when he contends

mplaint about either the form or content of that determination. CONCLUSION The judgment of conviction should be affirmed. Respectfully submitted, CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County GINA MIGNOLA DEBORAH L MORSE Assistant District Attorneys Of Counsel August 2011 -63- EFTA00181213 -

n - First Department THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, - against - JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Defendant-Appellant BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County Attorney for Respondent One Hogan Place New York, New York 10013 danyappea s any.nyc.gov GINA MIGNOLA

ase and thus posed a significant risk to the community. The court acted correctly, and certainly well within its discretion, when it concluded that the People's stated concerns did not cast any meaningful doubt on the propriety of the Board's recommendation. D. Nor is defendant persuasive when he contends