Epstein Secrets

mplaint about either the form or content of that determination. CONCLUSION The judgment of conviction should be affirmed. Respectfully submitted, CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County GINA MIGNOLA DEBORAH'. MORSE Assistant District Attorneys Of Counsel August 2011 -63- EFTA00602404 -

- First Department THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, - against - JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Dc.fendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County Attorney for Respondent One Hogan Place New York, New York 10013 (212) 335-9000 [email protected]

onal right to due process (Brief for Defendant at 32-33). That notion was never mentioned below, so it has not been preserved for appellate review. People v. Kello, 96 N.Y.2d 740, 744 (2001)(constitutional complaints must be raised with specificity). In any event, the short answer is that, as set out herein, t

mplaint about either the form or content of that determination. CONCLUSION The judgment of conviction should be affirmed. Respectfully submitted, CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County GINA MIGNOLA DEBORAH L. MORSE Assistant District Attorneys Of Counsel August 2011 -63- EFTA00792566

- First Department THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, - against - JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Dcfendant-Appellant. BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County Attorney for Respondent One Hogan Place New York, New York 10013 (212) 335-9000 [email protected]

onal right to due process (Brief for Defendant at 32-33). That notion was never mentioned below, so it has not been preserved for appellate review. People v. Kello, 96 N.Y.2d 740, 744 (2001)(constitutional complaints must be raised with specificity). In any event, the short answer is that, as set out herein, t

mplaint about either the form or content of that determination. CONCLUSION The judgment of conviction should be affirmed. Respectfully submitted, CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County GINA MIGNOLA DEBORAH L MORSE Assistant District Attorneys Of Counsel August 2011 -63- EFTA00181213 -

n - First Department THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, - against - JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN Defendant-Appellant BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT CYRUS R. VANCE, JR. District Attorney New York County Attorney for Respondent One Hogan Place New York, New York 10013 danyappea s any.nyc.gov GINA MIGNOLA

onal right to due process (Brief for Defendant at 32-33). That notion was never mentioned below, so it has not been preserved for appellate review. People v. Kello, 96 N.Y.2d 740, 744 (2001)(constitutbnal complaints must be raised with specificity). In any event, the short answer is that, as set out herein, th