Epstein Secrets

From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: Daniel Gelernter Subject: Re: numbers follow-up Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:05:33 +0000 silly response. Lesson 1 why risk no deal for such a small difference in a

response. Lesson 1 why risk no deal for such a small difference in a big win. ? On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Daniel Gelernter - > wrote: Hi Jeffery -- Fair enough; we could accept that if you'd make it 65-35 above 20M and 80-20 above 50M, and if we could close this right away. Regards, Dan On Wed, Oc

split is .40 50 50 untl 20 million 60.40 up until 40. 70 30 above 50.. the larger amounts in your favor of course On W=d, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Daniel Gelernter < > a Dear Jeffrey - Regarding ou= conversation yesterday, we'd propose the following for a $1M investme=t: Any sale at or above $50M, the in=est

From: on behalf of Daniel Gelernter <Ma Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 3:05 AM To: Jeffrey Epstein Subject: Re: numbers follow-up Hi Jeffery -- Fair enough; we could accept that if y=u'd make it 65-35 above 20M and 80-20 above 50M, and if we could close=this right away. Regards, Dan On Wed, Oc

From: jeffrey E. <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 2:34 PM To: Daniel Gelernter Subject: Re: numbers follow-up if you are short of cash im happy to fund without docs. 10=k? On T=u, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Daniel Gelernter <

Lesson 1 why risk no deal fo= such a small difference in a big win. ? On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at =1:04 PM, Daniel Gelernter < wrote: <mailtc l> Hi Jeffery -- Fair enough; w= could accept that if you'd make it 65-35 above 20M and 80-20 above 50=, and if we could close this right away. Regards, =div>Dan On We