Epstein Secrets

n the process of carrying out and concluding your investigation. your client, Lawrence =rauss, copied me on his February 23rd em=il communication to the Office of Equity and Inclusion. I am writing =o convey the University's position on its responsibility to =onduct administrative investigations into allegations of

eted its fact =athering. Our courts recognize that participants in an administrative investigation have a =rivilege against a defamation charge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 14= Ariz. 335, 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that the employer's response to a notice of charge of =iscrimination filed

0in 0.0001pt;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Times=New Roman",serif">Your client, Lawrence Krauss, copied me on =is February 23rd email communication to the Office of Equity and l=clusion. I am writing to convey the University's position on=its responsibility to conduct administrative investigations into allegatio=s of

657719 EFTA02520780 * Our courts recog=ize that participants in an administrative investigation have a privilege =gainst a defamation charge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 140 Ariz. 335= 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that the employ=r's response to a notice of charge of discrimination filed

//www.asu.edu/aad/manuals/acd/acd401.html) =nd its accompanying procedures (P20 — link to the procedures is =mbedded in the policy document) directs the Office of Equity and =nclusion to conduct prompt and equitable investigations. Among =he points stated are that the Office accepts anonymous complaints as =ell as d

eted its fact =athering. Our courts recognize that participants in an administrative investigation have a =rivilege against a defamation charge. In Paros v. Hoemako Hospital, 140 Ariz. 335, 681 P.2d 918 (Ct. App. Div. 2 1984), the court recognized that the employer's response to a notice of charge of =iscrimination filed