Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ptember 8, 2010, the Court issued an Administrative Order Closing the Case. (DE 38.) Shortly thereafter, Petitioners filed a "Notice in Response to Administrative Order," (DE39,) stating that they intended to file documents soon thereafter in connection with the case. On October 12, 2010, the Court issued an Order t
States — via the federal courts — to act in ways never contemplated by the CVRA's drafters. For example, a prisoner filed a writ of mandamus asking the Third Circuit Court of Appeals to find that the United States had violated his victims' rights under the CVRA by failing to file a Rule 35 motion to reduce his sentenc
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ptember 8, 2010, the Court issued an Administrative Order Closing the Case. (DE 38.) Shortly thereafter, Petitioners filed a "Notice in Response to Administrative Order," (DE39,) stating that they intended to file documents soon thereafter in connection with the case. On October 12, 2010, the Court issued an Order t
States — via the federal courts — to act in ways never contemplated by the CVRA's drafters. For example, a prisoner filed a writ of mandamus asking the Third Circuit Court of Appeals to find that the United States had violated his victims' rights under the CVRA by failing to file a Rule 35 motion to reduce his sentenc
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ptember 8, 2010, the Court issued an Administrative Order Closing the Case. (DE 38.) Shortly thereafter, Petitioners filed a "Notice in Response to Administrative Order," (DE39,) stating that they intended to file documents soon thereafter in connection with the case. On October 12, 2010, the Court issued an Order t
States — via the federal courts — to act in ways never contemplated by the CVRA's drafters. For example, a prisoner filed a writ of mandamus asking the Third Circuit Court of Appeals to find that the United States had violated his victims' rights under the CVRA by failing to file a Rule 35 motion to reduce his sentenc
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (135)
Entities connected to both Administrative Order and the Third Circuit Court
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON9 w/ Administrative·6 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON8 w/ Administrative·5 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Administrative·6 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON4 w/ Administrative·6 w/ the
Petition
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Administrative·5 w/ the
United States
LOCATION4 w/ Administrative·6 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION5 w/ Administrative·5 w/ the
the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Administrative·5 w/ the
Prince Andrew
PERSON4 w/ Administrative·5 w/ the
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Administrative·5 w/ the
Michael Jackson
PERSON3 w/ Administrative·6 w/ the
Tallahassee
LOCATION3 w/ Administrative·6 w/ the
Anderson
PERSON4 w/ Administrative·5 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Administrative·5 w/ the
Kenneth Marra
PERSON5 w/ Administrative·4 w/ the
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON7 w/ Administrative·2 w/ the
Martha Stewart
PERSON3 w/ Administrative·5 w/ the
LB
Leon Black
PERSON3 w/ Administrative·5 w/ the
Michigan
LOCATION3 w/ Administrative·5 w/ the
FBI
ORGANIZATION3 w/ Administrative·5 w/ the