Epstein Secrets

onably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the government need only show that

xpression for 13 EFTA00071572 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 20 of 30 which the protection is claimed." United States v. Schwinanzer, 892 F.2d 237, 243 (2d Cir. 1989). "[T]he traditional rationale for the [attorney-client] privilege applies with special force in the government co

onably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the government need only show that

xpression for 13 EFTA00075455 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 20 of 30 which the protection is claimed." United States v. Schwinanzer, 892 F.2d 237, 243 (2d Cir. 1989). "[T]he traditional rationale for the [attorney-client] privilege applies with special force in the government co

onably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the government need only show that

xpression for 13 EFTA00088689 Case 1:20-cv-00833-PAE Document 25 Filed 08/05/20 Page 20 of 30 which the protection is claimed." United States v. Schwinanzer, 892 F.2d 237, 243 (2d Cir. 1989). "[T]he traditional rationale for the [attorney-client] privilege applies with special force in the government co