Epstein Secrets

onably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the government need only show that

t show that disclosure of the information in these records is likely to offer any significant insight into BOP operations. Particularly in light of the New York City Medical Examiner's public conclusion that Epstein hanged himself, the specific details of his suicide or the appearance of his body shortly thereafter do not shed any

onably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the government need only show that

t show that disclosure of the information in these records is likely to offer any significant insight into BOP operations. Particularly in light of the New York City Medical Examiner's public conclusion that Epstein hanged himself, the specific details of his suicide or the appearance of his body shortly thereafter do not shed any

onably foreseeable at the time of the withholding. See, e.g.,Kay v. F.C.C., 976 F. Supp. 23, 37-38 (D.D.C. 1997) (citing N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.,437 U.S. 214, 220 (1978)). The government's burden to establish the applicability of Exemption 7(A) is not high; the government need only show that

t show that disclosure of the information in these records is likely to offer any significant insight into BOP operations. Particularly in light of the New York City Medical Examiner's public conclusion that Epstein hanged himself, the specific details of his suicide or the appearance of his body shortly thereafter do not shed any